The Judgment Chief was also helpless; after consulting with the legal affairs director of the developer, he promptly reconvened the court and issued a judgment on the spot!
"The court believes that both parties have signed the subscription agreement based on their true intentions... After review, whether the clauses claimed by the plaintiff are invalid does not substantially affect the effectiveness of the pre-sale contract for the commercial housing..."
"In summary, the judgment is as follows:"
"The court orders the continuation of the contract's execution, rejects the plaintiff's requests, and the plaintiff shall bear the cost of litigation (already paid in advance)."
As for whether the overbearing terms in the contract should be deemed invalid, it is recommended to file a separate lawsuit.