Fiction. Science relies on facts and verifiable data. For mermaids to be real, there would need to be a whole host of biological, ecological and evolutionary factors to support their existence. The so - called new evidence is likely to be a result of over - active imaginations or attempts to gain attention. There have been no real scientific studies that have provided evidence of mermaids, and until there are, we should consider them as fictional entities.
Fiction. If we look at the history of mermaid claims, they are always based on something that can be rationally explained away. The new evidence, whatever it may be, probably falls into the same category. It could be a case of people seeing what they want to see or misidentifying something ordinary as a mermaid. There's no real evidence to suggest that these mythical creatures actually exist.
Fiction. Consider this, in all of our exploration of the oceans, which is still not complete but quite extensive, we have not found any conclusive evidence of mermaids. The idea of a half - human, half - fish creature goes against the known biological principles. For a mermaid to exist as commonly depicted, it would require a very strange and unlikely combination of mammalian and fish - like characteristics that have no basis in evolutionary biology.
Fact. There has been new evidence emerging over time that supports the existence of megalodon in the past. Fossil records are a major part of this evidence. These fossils show the large size of their teeth and some skeletal remains which give us an idea of their massive size and structure. Also, studies on ancient ocean ecosystems suggest that an apex predator like megalodon could have thrived in those conditions.
Well, mermaids are fiction. While there have been many reported sightings over the years, these can be attributed to misidentifications. For example, sailors in the past might have seen manatees or dugongs from a distance and, due to the long periods at sea and the power of imagination, thought they were mermaids. Also, mermaids are a common theme in fictional stories, like 'The Little Mermaid', which further shows their fictional nature.
The main new evidence is from improved fossil analysis. Scientists are now able to extract more information from megalodon teeth and bones. For example, they can study the chemical composition to understand what the megalodon ate. Another type of new evidence comes from advanced geological studies. By looking at the layers of rock where megalodon fossils are found, they can determine the time period more accurately and also understand the environmental conditions at that time.
There is some fiction involved. While Titleist drivers can offer good performance, the marketing sometimes makes it seem like they will solve all your golfing problems. In reality, your own skill and consistency play a huge role. A new Titleist driver can't make up for a bad swing or lack of practice. However, if you have a decent swing and are looking for an upgrade, they can offer some real benefits in terms of distance and accuracy.
Evolution is a fact. Evidence includes fossil records which display a clear sequence of life forms over time. For instance, the discovery of Archaeopteryx, a creature with both reptilian and avian features, is strong evidence for evolution.
Regarding evidence for Moses, religious texts are a major source. The detailed accounts in the Torah, for instance, are seen as evidence by believers. But from a scientific and archaeological perspective, it's more complex. There are no inscriptions or artifacts that directly name Moses. However, some historians believe that the general story of a group of people leaving Egypt could be based on real events. And if there were such an event, it's likely there was a leader, which could be Moses. So, the evidence is not conclusive either way.
Most likely fiction. There is no scientific evidence to prove the existence of mermaids. While there are many myths and legends about them, these are likely the result of sailors mistaking manatees or other sea creatures for half - human, half - fish beings.
Sure. 'Science fact or fiction' is crucial. Fact in science means something that has been repeatedly verified. Take gravity, it's a fact as we can observe its effects constantly. Fiction could be things like the idea of telepathy without any scientific basis yet. This concept helps us in scientific research to know what to trust and what needs more investigation.
Evidence for it being fiction lies in the movie - specific elements. The idea of a love story that unfolds so perfectly during a disaster is more of a creative concept. On the other hand, the fact that there were people of different classes on the Titanic means relationships could have formed. But the elaborate and fictional details of the movie's love story, such as the grand gestures and the specific character backgrounds, are not based on historical fact.