Rosalind Franklin's sad tale lies in the fact that she was on the verge of a major scientific breakthrough regarding the structure of DNA. Her X - ray crystallography images were of great importance. But in the scientific race, Watson and Crick got hold of her data. She was not given the due recognition she deserved. Also, her early death from ovarian cancer meant that she could not fight for her rightful place in the history of the discovery. The scientific community at that time did not fully appreciate her efforts and the role she played in what turned out to be a revolutionary discovery.
Rosalind Franklin's sad story is that she made crucial contributions to the discovery of the structure of DNA through her X - ray diffraction images, but she was not fully recognized at the time. Her data was used by Watson and Crick without her proper acknowledgement. This led to her being overshadowed in one of the most significant scientific discoveries of the 20th century.
Well, Rosalind Franklin's story is really a sad one. She was a brilliant scientist. She worked hard on DNA research and her X - ray diffraction work was key to understanding the structure of DNA. However, Watson and Crick, who are more famous for the discovery, used her data without her consent or proper credit. She was also facing discrimination as a woman in the male - dominated scientific community at that time, which added to the unfairness she experienced.
Rosalind Franklin's story in relation to the DNA discovery is indeed a sad one. Her X - ray diffraction studies on DNA were groundbreaking. She had the skills and the scientific acumen to make significant progress on her own. However, the way Watson and Crick used her data was unethical. They were able to build their model of the double - helix structure of DNA with the help of her images. Franklin was not only deprived of the proper credit but also faced difficulties because of her gender in the scientific community. Her work was not given the prominence it deserved during her lifetime. And because of her early death, she was left out of the full glory of the discovery that her work had significantly contributed to.
In the 'franklin plays the game story', Franklin is likely the main character. He could be a human being with unique traits and qualities. Maybe he is known for his competitiveness in games or his friendly nature towards other players. Without reading the story, we can't be certain about his exact identity but he is the one central to the action of playing the game.
Well, it could be a blend. Maybe it takes inspiration from real-life situations but is embellished or restructured for a more engaging narrative.
It depends. Some parts of Franklin might be based on real events or people, but it could also have fictional elements added for entertainment purposes.
I'm not sure specifically as there could be many 'Franklin Friends' stories. It might be about the adventures and friendship of a character named Franklin and his friends, perhaps their daily life in a forest or a small town, sharing joys and sorrows together.
I'm not sure specifically as there could be many stories named 'Franklin in the Dark'. It might be about a character named Franklin who experiences something in the dark, like an adventure, a discovery or a spooky encounter.
Well, a classic Franklin story often features simple yet charming illustrations, a heartwarming tone, and themes that kids and adults can appreciate. It might also have a good balance of adventure and learning moments.
A Kirk Franklin story usually centers around themes of faith, hope, and the power of music to inspire and bring people together.
I'm not sure. Maybe you can provide more context or check Dickens' works list to find out.
No, Franklin is purely fictional. It was developed by the imagination of the creators, not inspired by real events or people.