Is Atlantis in history fact or fiction?

Fiction. There is no conclusive scientific evidence that Atlantis actually existed as described in the ancient myths. The story of Atlantis is often seen as a fictional creation, perhaps used to convey moral or philosophical ideas in ancient times.

It's more likely to be fiction. We only have Plato's account which was written long after the supposed time of Atlantis. And there are no archaeological finds that match the grand description of Atlantis. All the things we expect to find for a real ancient civilization, like buildings, tools, inscriptions related to Atlantis specifically, are missing.

Well, it's a bit of both. In the realm of ancient legends, Atlantis was described as a highly advanced and prosperous civilization that was eventually lost. However, from a scientific perspective, we haven't found definitive evidence of its existence. Some people believe that certain archaeological findings, like the submerged ruins in some parts of the world, could be remnants of Atlantis. But others argue that these are just normal ruins from other ancient civilizations. So, until more evidence surfaces, it remains a mystery and could be considered more on the fictional side.

Fiction. We haven't found any real proof yet.

It's more in the realm of fiction. Although the idea of Atlantis is captivating, there's a lack of concrete evidence to suggest it was an actual city that existed in the way it's been described.

The Atlantis real story is likely a blend of fact and fiction. Plato was a philosopher, and he might have used the idea of Atlantis to convey certain philosophical or moral ideas. However, the descriptions he gave of its advanced technology and grandeur could potentially be based on some real, but now lost, ancient civilization. There have been many attempts to find Atlantis, but without success so far, which makes it difficult to determine whether it was real or just a fictional creation.

History is a combination of both. It's based on facts, but the interpretation and presentation of those facts can sometimes be influenced by various factors, making it seem a bit fictional in some cases.

The history of the Hebrews is based on fact. There are numerous historical records, archaeological findings, and religious texts that support it. For example, the Hebrew Bible contains historical accounts that have been corroborated by external sources in some cases. Also, archaeological excavations in the region have unearthed artifacts and evidence of Hebrew settlements, their religious practices, and their social structures.

History is fact. Think about historical battles like the Battle of Waterloo. There are military records, eyewitness accounts, and physical evidence on the battlefield. These all prove that it was a real event that took place at a specific time. Of course, over time, stories might get embellished, but if we dig deep into the primary sources, we can separate the truth from the made - up parts. So, it's not fiction but a record of what actually happened in the past.

Most of the 9/11 conspiracy theories are fiction. The official account, which has been thoroughly investigated by multiple agencies, is based on facts. The attacks were carried out by al - Qaeda terrorists. The evidence includes the identification of the hijackers, their known associations with terrorist groups, and the flight paths of the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.