Are there any strong arguments against reading fiction?

One argument against reading fiction is that it's seen as a waste of time. Some people think that time could be better spent on non - fictional works like self - help books or educational textbooks that directly contribute to knowledge acquisition or career development.

One reason against science fiction could be that it's often seen as too far - fetched. Some people think that the concepts like time travel or alien invasions are completely unrealistic and have no basis in real life, so they consider it a waste of time to engage with such stories.

For the 'fact' side, some point to strange ancient structures like Stonehenge that seem difficult to build with the technology of the time. However, against it, archaeologists have shown that humans were quite capable of such feats through trial and error and the development of specialized skills. For example, the way the stones were cut and placed at Stonehenge can be understood as a result of the knowledge and tools available to the ancient people who built it.

It's fiction. Well, first, the earth's density as calculated from its mass and volume is not compatible with a hollow structure. Second, the paths that seismic waves take when earthquakes occur clearly show the existence of solid and liquid layers, not a hollow space. And third, if there were a hollow earth, there would be no explanation for how the continents and oceans are formed and move as they do, which is well - understood based on plate tectonics in a solid - earth model.

One argument against graphic novels is that some people consider them to be less literary. They think that the heavy use of pictures detracts from the written word and the development of complex language skills. For example, in a traditional novel, readers have to visualize the scenes and characters solely based on the text, which is seen as a more 'intellectual' exercise.

One argument could be that it lacks the typical colorful and simplistic style of many cartoons. Maybe the art style is too realistic or complex to be considered a traditional cartoon.

Some people think comics aren't educational and just a form of entertainment. They might say they don't build important skills like reading complex texts.

Some people think comics don't have much educational value and are just for entertainment.

It goes against the principle of full disclosure. When we tell a story, we should strive to provide all the relevant information. A name is often a relevant piece of information. It can influence how we perceive the actions and motives in the story. If it's withheld, it's like presenting an incomplete picture to the audience.