The most classic game of two people taking turns to take beads

In a game where two people took turns to pick up beads, there were a total of 40 beads. Starting from the first bead, they could pick up a maximum of four beads at a time, and a minimum of one bead at a time. They had to pick up the last bead. Whoever picked up the last bead would win. First, we can consider an optimal strategy. Assuming that the first player needed to get the $n$bead to win, then the second player only needed to get the $n-1 $bead, the $n-2$bead, the $n-3$bead, the $n-4$bead, the $n-5$bead, the $n-6$bead, the $n-7$bead, the $n-8$bead, the $n-9$bead, the $n-10 $bead, the $n-11 $bead, the $n-12 $bead. No.$n-13 $, No.$n-14 $, No.$n-15 $, No.$n-16 $, No.$n-17 $, No.$n-18 $, No.$n-19 $, No.$n-20$, No.$n-21$, No.$n-22$, No.$n-23$, No.$n-24$, No.$n-25$, No.$n-26$No.$n-27$, No.$n-28$, No.$n-29$, No.$n-30$, No.$n-31$, No.$n-32$, No.$n-33$, No.$n-34$, No.$n-35$, No.$n-36$, No.$n-37$, No.$n-38$, No.$n-39$, No.$n-40$, It would guarantee the victory of the player who came after him. Therefore, the first player needed to adopt the optimal strategy. The number of beads taken each time and the number of beads taken by the second player was 5. This way, the first player could guarantee that he would get the 40th bead and win. While waiting for the TV series, you can also click on the link below to read the classic original work of "Dafeng Nightwatchman"!

The most classic two-person-to-take-turns was a game where two players took turns to take a certain number of beads from a pile of beads. According to the information provided, there was a strategy to win. First, he would take 4 orbs, and then he would make sure that the number of orbs he took each time was 5. Then, he would definitely be able to get the last orb.

The most classic two-person-to-take-turns was a game where two players took turns to take a certain number of beads from a pile of beads. Whoever could obtain more beads would be the winner of the game. This game seemed simple, but it actually contained a wealth of psychological games and strategic skills. According to the information provided, there was a strategy to win. In a question, there were 60 beads. The two of them took turns to take at least one bead each time, and a maximum of three beads. They were not allowed to not take them. Whoever took the last bead would win. According to the analysis, regardless of how many pills the first person took, as long as the last person guaranteed to get a total of four pills with the other party, they would definitely be able to get the last pill and win. Therefore, the winning strategy was to first take 4 beads, then the other party would take n beads, and he would take (4-n) beads.

The most classic two-person-to-take-turns was a game where two players took turns to take a certain number of beads from a pile of beads. According to the information provided, there was a strategy to win. He would first take 4 orbs, and then make sure that the number of orbs he took each time was 5. Then, he would definitely be able to get the 59th orb. This was because in each round, the sum of the number of beads taken by the two could be controlled to be 5. Therefore, after taking four beads, the other party would take n beads each time (1 <n <4), and he would take (5-n) beads. In this way, through calculation, the winning strategy was to first take 4 beads, then the other party would take n beads, and he would take (5-n) beads.

The most classic two-person-to-take-turns question was that there were a total of 60 beads. The two players would take turns to take one or two beads until all the beads were taken away. Whoever won first. According to the information provided, there was a strategy to win. He would first take 4 orbs, and then make sure that the number of orbs he took each time was 5. Then, he would definitely be able to get the 59th orb. This was because in each round, the sum of the number of beads taken by the two could be controlled to be 5. Therefore, after taking four beads, the other party would take n beads each time (1 <n <4), and he would take (5-n) beads. In this way, through calculation, the winning strategy was to first take 4 beads, then the other party would take n beads, and he would take (5-n) beads.

One such game is called 'Storytelling Relay'. In this game, players take turns adding to the story to create a unique narrative.

The following are some recommendations for ancient novels with two male leads: " Maple Ferry " was an ancient novel. The male and female lead both traveled through time. Their bodies and minds were clean. There were no fights in the house, no extreme relatives, and no sadomasochistic love. It was a relaxed and loving novel. 2. " The Rebirth of the Twin Beauties " was an ancient romance novel. It was about two female protagonists who had transmigrated to an era similar to the Spring and Autumn Period and Warring States Period. These novels were all unpopular works by the two male protagonists of the ancient prose. They had unique plots and attractive storylines.

Di Renjie's most classic line from the Jade Beads Case was not found in the search results provided.

Yes. I recommend the two books, Super Infinite Loop Game and Invincibility Begins When I Wake Up, to you. "Super Infinite Loop Game" was a fantasy novel about a different world. The protagonist only used his fists to reason with people in the other world, and he was not bound by morality. "Invincibility Begins When I Wake Up" was also a fantasy novel. It told the story of the main character waking up with an invincible ability. Both of these books meet your needs. The protagonist is very strong at the beginning and uses his fists to deal with all schemes and plots. I hope you like this fairy's recommendation. Muah ~😗

It promotes fairness. Everyone gets an equal chance, whether it's in a game or in a conversation. This makes the interaction more enjoyable for all.