bruh_nigger

This is a proper use of a semicolon. A semicolon is used to separate two independent clauses, or to separate items in a list when those items contain commas. In this sentence, the semicolon separates two independent clauses that are closely related in meaning. The first independent clause in the sentence is "Atheists have no foundation for their morality". This clause is a complete sentence because it contains a subject ("Atheists") and a verb ("have"). The second independent clause in the sentence is "it changes with the times, becoming more and more warped, until it is eventually considered completely incompatible with the true standards of righteousness". This clause is also a complete sentence because it contains a subject ("it") and a verb ("is considered"). The two independent clauses are closely related in meaning, as they both provide information about the morality of atheists. The semicolon helps to link the two clauses together and make it clear that they are closely related in meaning. The semicolon acts as a bridge between the two independent clauses and shows that they are two separate ideas that are connected. In this case, the semicolon is a proper use of punctuation because it separates two independent clauses and shows their relationship.

No, the sentence is not a run-on sentence. A run-on sentence is a sentence that contains two or more independent clauses without proper punctuation to separate them. In this sentence, there are two independent clauses: "They are godless heathens, believing in, literally and metaphorically, nothing" and "they believe in both 'nothing' after death and have no beliefs". These two independent clauses are separated by a semicolon, which is a proper way to separate two independent clauses. The semicolon indicates a closer relationship between the two clauses than a period would, but it still separates them into distinct ideas. Additionally, the first independent clause is not a run-on sentence because it contains a comma and the conjunction "and" to separate the subclauses. The first independent clause is composed of several subclauses, but they are separated by commas, which makes the sentence grammatically correct. In conclusion, the sentence is not a run-on sentence because it separates the two independent clauses with a semicolon and the first independent clause is not a run-on sentence because it contains proper punctuation to separate the subclauses.

The semicolon is used properly in this sentence because it separates two independent clauses that are closely related in meaning. An independent clause is a complete sentence that contains a subject and a verb and can stand alone as a sentence. The first independent clause in the sentence is "I can see none as true believers". This clause is a complete sentence because it contains a subject ("I") and a verb ("can see"). The second independent clause in the sentence is "in fact, they aren't even false believers". This clause is also a complete sentence because it contains a subject ("they") and a verb ("aren't"). The two independent clauses are related in meaning, as they both provide information about the beliefs of the people being referred to. The semicolon helps to link the two clauses together and make it clear that they are closely related in meaning. The semicolon acts as a bridge between the two independent clauses and shows that they are two separate ideas that are connected. In this case, the semicolon is a proper use of punctuation because it separates two independent clauses and shows their relationship.

Very true.