It is a little rough around the edges, mostly fine, though. If I notice anything that is frustrating or difficult to read, I'll let you know, do keep in mind most people who read wont give a review since even if they know the book has an issue or could be better, they dont know how to specifically improve it. Writing has a lot to do with understanding a reader's psychology better than they understand their own psychology, so something like youtube is better if you want tips to improve, especially since many readers have no clue what they are talking about, and often will tell you they want one thing when in reality if you do that, they will stop reading. Readers may be dying to know what happens after a cliffhanger, and demanding you get to the climax immediately, but if you listen and rush it, the result generally turns out really poorly and that same reader will not like it. Not that its not good to pay attention to what your readers are saying, listening to what directions your audience want the book to go in can give you insight into what genre and tone to set for your future chapters, but keep in mind readers often dont actually know what they want, therefore will not give advice or will give poor advice.
Buku ini telah dihapus.
Nah, this book needs an editor.The author meant mc's gift for turning 1 was the martial arts manual, but he was too young, so the grandparents told him he would receive his gift when he turned 5.(Idk why he is receiving it at age 4)
Buku ini telah dihapus.
A lot of the stuff youve done would result in some backlash. But this tops all of it, doing this is like the original sin in gaming. There is no gaming community that would not immediately be outraged upon this happening.
Even though the company was forcing Players to do something they didn't want to do, this was seen very well by the game's community, as unlike other companies who wanted Players to spend as much time as possible playing their game, Mojang did the opposite, preventing Players from overplaying and affecting their health.
MARVEL: GAME MAKER SYSTEM
Movies · NunuXD
Even if only agaisnt non awakened that would be a hella strong skill, there would still be many non awakened with high status.
Has the ability to make suggestions to people that will cause them to act a certain way for a short period of time. Success rate depends on the will of the target. If the target has a stronger will than the user, then the skill will fail.
I Became the Demon King of Lust
Fantasy · DXHaseoXD
TLDR: The conundrum is that, is it right to give up an item at the core of an issue that could destroy America due to the violence and tragedy the item currently causes?The issue of firearms is not just an issue of preventing school shootings. The issue is where to draw the line on what knowledge and items are available to the public. The issue bigger than that is who decides on it, since, yes, a majority of people will not "need" a gun to protect their safety, although there are still many parts of America you can get a gun easily illegally, its just even easier to get it legally, which makes people turn to illegal guns less, which presents its own paradox. Since Americans do not "need" them, the argument is that the government should take them away. Not to mention that the history of America with guns is similar to the beginning of the history of the katana in Japan, making it much harder to take them away, but also more importantly, if the government decides they can take away guns and the knowledge to make them, what else can they slowly do to us using that privilege, and would they abuse that privilege, how would they do so, why would they do so, and is there a precedent? Considering many released expirments, its not unreasonable to think that the government does not have the interest of its people in mind, and has possibly gotten absorbed in certain ideals that will end with it destroying itself. There arent many items society considered integral to it except for necessities and items of culture, so although there has been previous and similar cases, the gun has unfortunately become the trigger(Pun intended), because the previous cases didnt involve the complete erridication of permanent necessities or items of culture. So although the gun isn't exactly the best item to support with it being it being so linked with violence and tragedy, it is also one of the few things a majority of America can get together on to force people to look at the bigger issue.As for answering the questions the questions of how and why the government would abuse this privilege and is there a precedent, as well as what is the extent of the precedents, is all a seperate part of this arguement that I will not go into, but my basic point is that the argument isnt just over guns, guns just happen to be an item of cultural importance in America, and the argument is that if the government is allowed to revoke items with such a link to a majority of people in daily life, what can they do to items that are considered less important, how much can they edit pubkic knowledge, how much of it is behind a paywall or certain status, how much of it is behind skill locks, to where people who can properly handle the knowledge can access it, and what hoops must be jumped through to gain thise skills. Theres a ton more to this but Im gonna end on the point people like to make one side of this argument look stupid but each side has valid concerns. On one hand, you have a lethal weapon, that is very easily obtainable, causing serious tragedies across the nation even in places like schools where we consider our kids to be safe, and on the other hand there is the worry that if the government has the privilege to take something of major cultural importance away despite the serious backlash, what does that say about our governments ability to listen and look out for our needs, combined with its past expirments, many of which where hushed despite being publicly released? Do we put out the raging inferno in front of us, or let it burn what we consider precious to create a stopgap for an even bigger fire, and how confident would we be in putting out the bigger fire if we do not create a stopgap? Its not an easy question to answer, making jokes is fine but dont degrade one side for no reason.
However, the people for the ownership of firearms used this as an excuse to proliferate it further. "This is a perfect example of why more people should own weapons!" They would claim. "Throw a weapon into the arms of the teachers!" They'd then add.
The Good Teacher
Fantasy · Junior_Sundar
"Oh it might be perfect recreations of every house but its just a good image recreation from pictures on google." If you think about that for more than about 1 second I think youll realize how stupid that sounds, thats not a funny joke that people just gloss over
In the end, Su Ping didn't add an invisible wall to the game, which won the unanimous praise of the players!
I Developed The Zombie Apocalypse And Netizens Went Crazy With Excitement
Games · Loaded Dice
I saw the first 3 earlier today, didnt fall for the rest of them :D
Are one of the 2 girls using his old pod? That would explain the spectator mode thing.
Vital energy, qi, and system energy?
'There seem to be three types of energies apparently, huh? I wonder what's the difference between them? Also, what's this new 'scanner' function.' Lin Wu wondered.
Rise Of The Worm Sovereign
Eastern · Grand_Void_Daoist
Restaurants arent in the silverware business and movie theaters dont produce projecters.If you can make futuristic headbands, then make futuristic headbands. Sell the headbands. Someone else who makes prosthetics can use your product to make prosthetics. If you sell headbands, why are you trying to sell prosthetics? Let someone who makes prosthetics do it, worry about headbands.
Disabled people don't have a one-size-fits-all physique. They have different heights, ages, body shapes, and disabilities. This means that every product needs to be adjusted according to the individual's specific physical condition during installation.
Building a Gaming Empire From Scratch
Urban · Zoo of Darwin