steven pinker criticism

Steven Pinker is mainly known for his non - fiction works rather than novels. He is a cognitive psychologist and linguist, and his books are mostly about language, the mind, and human nature, such as 'The Better Angels of Our Nature' which is not a novel but a great exploration of the decline of violence in human history.

I highly recommend 'Enlightenment Now'. Pinker makes a strong case for how the values of the Enlightenment, such as reason, science, and humanism, have led to improvements in human well - being over time. He presents data on things like life expectancy, poverty reduction, and education to support his arguments. It's a great book for those interested in the big picture of human progress.

Literature criticism and literary criticism were both ways of evaluating and analyzing literary works, but the focus and perspective were slightly different. Literature criticism refers to the subjective evaluation and analysis of literary works, mainly focusing on the characteristics and contents of literary works in terms of ideology, art, culture, etc., emphasizing the interpretation and understanding of the works themselves. Critists would use various methods such as reading, thinking, discussion, and analysis to conduct in-depth exploration and evaluation of works. Literature criticism, on the other hand, paid more attention to the analysis of the social, historical, and cultural background of literary works, as well as the author's intention, purpose, and creative process. The criticism mainly focused on the meaning, value, and influence of the work, emphasizing the evaluation of the relationship between the work and the era, society, history, and culture. Critiques tended to focus on being objective and fair, avoiding the interference of subjective colors. Therefore, the main difference between literary criticism and literary criticism lies in the focus of evaluation and analysis. One is the interpretation and understanding of the work itself, and the other is the evaluation of the relationship between the work and the times, society, and culture.

Literature criticism is a method of evaluating and analyzing literary works. In literary criticism, the critics would analyze and evaluate the language, structure, theme, style, etc. of the literary works to reveal the meaning and extension of the works. Common literary criticism methods included: 1. structural criticism: analyze the plot, characters, clues and other structural elements of the work to reveal the internal logic and narrative rules of the work. 2. Language criticism: study the language, vocabulary, grammar, rhetoric and other aspects of the work to reveal the language art and language style of the work. 3. Thematic criticism: analyze the theme, emotions, thoughts, and other elements of the work to reveal the social and cultural background of the work and the author's ideology. 4. Style criticism: analyze the narrative style, description style, structure style and other style elements of the work to reveal the creative style of the work. 5. Accepting criticism: analyzing the process of acceptance of literary works to explore the readers 'acceptance and feelings of the works. 6. Comparative criticism: By comparing and analyzing the literary works of different works, different eras, and different schools, it reveals the differences and similarities between the works. The choice of literary criticism method depends on the research interest of the critics, the object of criticism, and the purpose and content of the criticism. Through the comprehensive application of a variety of critical methods, we can more comprehensively and deeply reveal the meaning and extension of the works and improve the ability to understand and evaluate literary works.

One common point of criticism is historical inaccuracy. Some historical fictions may distort facts for the sake of a more exciting plot. For example, they might misinterpret the motives of historical figures or change the sequence of historical events. Another criticism is anachronistic language or behavior. If the characters in a historical novel use modern slang or display modern values that are out of place in the historical context, it can be off - putting to readers who expect authenticity.

Lu Xun's literary criticism advocated against the criticism of facts and metaphysics. Fact-based criticism refers to a specific analysis and description of the shortcomings or shortcomings of a specific work or character, not involving the overall evaluation of the work or character. Metaphysical criticism, on the other hand, refers to the general evaluation of works or characters from one-sided and isolated problems without specific analysis and practical basis. Lu Xun believed that the matter-of-fact-style criticism was easy to fall into trivial details and could not dig into the inner meaning and value of the works; while the metaphysical criticism was easy to ignore the overall background and context of the works or characters, resulting in a one-sided understanding and evaluation of the works or characters. Therefore, Lu Xun advocated a comprehensive, comprehensive, and in-depth criticism of works or characters, opposing a single, partial criticism.

A literary review was an article that commented and evaluated literary works. Literature criticism usually analyzed and discussed specific works from multiple perspectives to help readers better understand and appreciate the meaning and extension of the works. The main purpose of literary criticism is to provide readers with useful information and enlightenment and to promote the understanding and appreciation of literary works. That's right. The reviews would usually discuss the background, style, theme, and plot of the work to understand it. The comments could also be used to judge the pros and cons and value. Both literary criticism and criticism are used to analyze and discuss literary works and to provide readers with useful information and enlightenment to promote the understanding and appreciation of literary works.

Literature criticism is a literary activity that reviews and analyses literary works, usually including their content, form, style, theme, symbolism, and language techniques, and exploring the social, cultural, and political impacts of these works. The purpose of literary criticism is to help readers better understand literary works and to discover and appreciate the beauty and meaning in literary works.

A literary review was a type of literary criticism that was an analysis of literary works. Literature criticism would usually focus on a particular literary work or discuss its literary style, theme, structure, language, and other characteristics and advantages. The purpose of literary criticism is to let readers better understand literary works and promote the development and prosperity of literature.

To form an objective and comprehensive art criticism, one had to consider many aspects, including the artist's work itself, the background of the era, the social and cultural background, as well as the artist's personal style and characteristics. The critics needed to conduct in-depth research and analysis of the works, and then evaluate and elaborate on the works with their own thoughts and opinions. The real art criticism should be objective and independent, not biased towards any artist or work, but based on the art itself as the starting point to analyze and discuss the artist's creative behavior, artistic style, and the thoughts and emotions expressed by the works. Real art criticism also needed to consider the aesthetic needs and cultural background of the audience to provide a more comprehensive and in-depth artistic knowledge and experience.