fiction based on history

Dinosaurs are not fiction. They were real creatures that lived millions of years ago. We know this from fossils and various scientific studies.

It's very likely. Given the wide reach and cultural impact of SYTYCD, the idea of basing fiction on its cast history is appealing. Fiction writers might be attracted to the real - life drama, the dreams and aspirations of the cast members, and the overall excitement of the dance competition. They could use this as a starting point to create engaging stories that either stay true to the essence of the show or take creative liberties to explore different scenarios and emotions related to the cast.

One of the best is 'The Pillars of the Earth' by Ken Follett. It's set in 12th - century England and vividly portrays the building of a cathedral. The characters are complex and the story gives a great sense of the historical period, with details about politics, religion, and the daily lives of people.

Arachne is more of a fantasy fiction. It typically involves mythical and imaginative elements rather than being strictly based on historical events or facts.

There are quite a few. 'Steampunk' stories often blend Victorian - era history with science fiction elements. 'Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell' is a great example. It's set in an alternate version of 19th - century England and involves magic which is presented in a very scientific way. Also, 'Pride and Prometheus' combines Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein' with Jane Austen's 'Pride and Prejudice', mixing historical context with science fiction concepts.

It depends. Sometimes imaginative fiction can capture the essence and spirit of a historical period, even if it adds fictional characters or events. However, it might not be strictly historically accurate in every detail.

Reading fiction in history helps us understand different perspectives. It shows us how people might have felt and thought in those times, beyond just the facts. Also, it can make complex historical events and concepts easier to grasp through storytelling.

Sure. 'The Pillars of the Earth' by Ken Follett is a great one. It's set in 12th - century England and vividly depicts the building of a cathedral. Another is 'Wolf Hall' by Hilary Mantel, which delves into the court of Henry VIII. 'Gone with the Wind' also counts. It tells a story during the American Civil War, with a fictional character Scarlett O'Hara, against the backdrop of real historical events.

Well, historical based fiction often fills in the gaps that formal history might leave. It can explore the emotions and personal stories of people who lived through historical events. For instance, in a fictional account of the Viking era, we might get to know how an ordinary Viking family felt about their raids. This humanizes history and makes it easier to understand the broader historical context. Also, it can make complex historical periods, like the Renaissance, more accessible by following the fictional adventures of a character within that time period.

Usually, the author who adapted the official history into a novel was a man-made author. Therefore, whether the novel was called "official history" depended on the reader's evaluation and recognition of the novel. Some people may think that the novel is similar to official history and call it "official history", while others think that the novel is different from official history or does not conform to historical facts, so they call it "unofficial history". However, in some cases, the author may deliberately ignore certain details or plots or reinterpret or arrange historical events, thus causing readers to doubt the authenticity of the novel. In this case, the author needs to clearly explain the authenticity and accuracy of the novel to the reader or it will be regarded as a fictional novel. Therefore, it was up to the reader's opinion and judgment whether or not to regard the adaptation of official history into a novel as "official history".