Definitely fiction. Robin Hood's adventures are part of folklore and imagination. There's no historical evidence to prove his existence as depicted in the stories.
Yes, it is likely based on some truth. In medieval England, there were social inequalities and forest outlaws. It's possible that a real figure or figures emerged as a sort of symbol against the unjust system. The tales of Robin Hood might have grown from the real struggles of the common people against the wealthy and powerful. But as the story was passed down through generations, it became filled with heroic deeds, like his amazing archery skills and his ability to outwit the Sheriff of Nottingham, which may not all be strictly historical.
Robin Hood is a fictional character. He is a well - known figure in English folklore, often depicted as a heroic outlaw who steals from the rich to give to the poor. While there may have been real - life outlaws or rebels who inspired the legend, there is no conclusive evidence of a single 'Robin Hood' figure actually existing in history.
Robin Hood is a bit of both. There are historical elements that suggest there could have been a real person or people who inspired the legend. However, much of the Robin Hood we know today is fictional. The stories of him stealing from the rich and giving to the poor are more like a moral tale.
Robin Hood's story is a mix of fact and fiction. While there might have been some real figures or events that inspired it, much of what we know is the product of imagination and storytelling.
Most historians believe that Robin Hood wasn't an actual person with the exact adventures depicted. The story likely combines elements of different real-life figures and fictional creations to form the popular legend we know.