commenting on ny times story

When commenting on a NY Times story, I often focus on the relevance of the topic to the current social or political climate. If the story is about a new policy, for instance, I consider how it will impact different groups of people. I also check if the story has updated information. Sometimes, older stories can be misleading as new developments may have occurred. Another aspect is the credibility of the sources within the story. If the sources are not reliable, it weakens the entire story. Based on these evaluations, I can then write a comment that either praises the story for its good reporting or points out its flaws.

Ethically, when commenting on a NY Times story, one should avoid spreading false information. If you're not sure about a fact, it's better to research it first. Also, respect the privacy of the individuals mentioned in the story. For example, if it's a story about a crime victim, don't use their name or details in a way that could cause further harm. Additionally, don't use offensive language. This maintains the integrity of the discussion around the story.

It was Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey from The New York Times. Their work on this story was so important. They risked a lot in investigating and reporting on Weinstein. Their story was the first domino to fall in what became a much larger movement against sexual harassment. They were committed to getting the truth out, and their efforts changed the conversation around harassment in Hollywood and beyond.

The NY Times Weinstein story was a turning point. It shined a very bright light on the long - standing issue of sexual harassment by powerful men like Weinstein. This story not only affected Weinstein's career and reputation but also sent shockwaves throughout the entertainment industry. Studios and production companies started to re - evaluate their policies regarding harassment. It also emboldened other women in different industries to speak out against similar abuse they had endured.

I'm not sure specifically as I haven't read that exact 'the lottery ny times story'. It could be about a lottery event in New York, perhaps covering things like the winners, the impact on their lives, or the process of the lottery in that area.

Well, without more context, it's difficult to say exactly. It might be a story that focuses on Biden's domestic initiatives, like his economic plans or healthcare reforms. The New York Times often covers how these policies are implemented, the reactions from different groups, and the potential impact on the American people. Maybe it's also about his diplomatic efforts around the world, such as dealing with climate change agreements or relations with other major powers.

I'm not entirely sure what specific aspect of the NY Times crossword 'That's Another Story' you are referring to. It could be a particular clue within the crossword. Maybe it's a themed crossword where the overall theme is related to stories in some way.

The NY Times covered it by reporting on the events as they unfolded. They sent journalists to the scene to get first - hand information.

One key point is the immediate chaos and destruction. The towers collapsing led to mass panic. Another is the heroic efforts of the first responders. They rushed into danger to save lives.

Typically, the story needs to be of high - quality writing. It should be engaging and have a clear focus. Also, if it's a news - related story, it must be timely.