Maybe the true story in 1996 is too painful or embarrassing for people to share. It could involve personal secrets, family issues, or some events that are difficult to face up to.
I'm not sure. It could be inspired by real-life situations but might not be a direct retelling of a specific true story. Maybe it's a fictional creation with elements that feel real.
No, it's not based on real events. The story was created by the filmmakers to entertain the audience. It might draw inspiration from common themes and situations, but it's not a true account of something that happened in real life.
It could be that there's some sort of pressure or threat preventing them from sharing the truth. Or perhaps they themselves don't fully understand the whole story.
It could be because of the potential harm it might cause. If the true story involves someone's mistakes or bad deeds, and telling it could damage that person's life further, then no one would be likely to tell it. Another reason could be that the story is part of a closed community's experience, and they don't want outsiders to know about it to maintain their exclusivity.
Maybe it's because they lack the confidence. Telling a lifetime true story requires a certain amount of self - assurance. If someone doesn't believe that their story is interesting or valuable enough, they won't tell it. Moreover, in a fast - paced world, people are often more focused on the present and future rather than delving into their past and sharing it.
Maybe there are consequences associated with telling the truth. People might be afraid of getting into trouble, like facing legal issues or ruining relationships. For example, if it's a story that involves some illegal activities that they were a part of or witnessed, they would rather keep it quiet to avoid being implicated.