Since I don't know the details of the 'disqus raw story', it's hard to say exactly. It might cover a range of subjects such as politics, entertainment, or technology. Maybe it contains some exclusive information or a unique perspective on a particular matter.
I'm not sure where exactly to access the 'disqus raw story'. It might be on a specific website that uses Disqus for its comment section. Check the source site related to the story.
The old comments on every story in Disqus could be a rich source of different perspectives. They might include the initial reactions of readers when the story was first published. For example, if it's a news story about a scientific discovery, the old comments could show how people's understanding and opinions have evolved over time. Also, they could contain valuable insights, critiques, or additional information related to the story that new readers might find interesting.
To access the old comments on every story in Disqus, first, you need to be on the page where the story is hosted. Then, look for the Disqus section. Usually, there are options to view all comments, which should include the old ones. Sometimes, there might be a dropdown or a pagination system that allows you to go back in time and see the earlier comments.
Well, a raw story is like the initial, untouched version of something that happened. It doesn't have all the polish and refinement that you might find in a more finished news article or narrative. It's kind of like getting the story straight from the source, without any added fluff.
If you want to read a new raw story, you can also check out some local writing groups or online forums where writers share their first drafts. These stories often have a certain rawness and authenticity that can be really engaging. They might not be perfect in terms of grammar or plot, but they can offer a fresh perspective.
It depends. Some sources within 'the raw story' might be very reliable if they base their reporting on facts and evidence. However, without a more in - depth look at its editorial policies and fact - checking procedures, it's hard to say for sure.