There have been cases where they reported false information regarding economic forecasts. They would predict doom and gloom scenarios for the economy based on their own biases rather than reliable economic data. This misinformation can mislead the public and create unnecessary panic. By not adhering to proper journalistic standards of fact - checking and balanced reporting, they end up producing such fake stories.
One common characteristic could be misinformation. For example, they might distort facts to fit a certain narrative. They could also lack proper sourcing. Often, a fake story in The Washington Times might be used to push a political agenda without solid evidence to back up the claims.
Check the sources. If they are unnamed or not from reliable institutions, it could be a fake story. For example, if a story cites 'an insider' without any more details, be suspicious.
The Washington Times' anti - Hillary stories often play into the existing political divide. They might pick up on any controversial aspect of her career. For example, they could spin her policy decisions in a negative light. It's also possible that they are trying to influence public opinion, especially among their readership which may have a particular political leaning. But we should always cross - reference such stories with other reliable sources to get a more accurate picture.
There are some who think that the NYT's coverage of political campaigns contains 'fake stories'. For instance, during an election, if a story is published about a candidate's past actions that doesn't align with the way a particular group wants to view the candidate. But in reality, the NYT is reporting based on sources and evidence. They may not always get it 100% right, but it's not fair to simply label it as 'fake'.
There are many ways such a fake story could start. It might have originated from a miscommunication. For example, someone misheard or misinterpreted something about the boy in Washington and then passed on the wrong information. Or perhaps it was a malicious act by someone who had a grudge against the boy or his family. They made up a story to damage his reputation. Another possibility is that it was just a baseless rumor that started in a small group and then spread like wildfire.
I'm not sure specifically which 'washington boy fake story' you are referring to. There could be many fictional or false stories related to a boy in Washington. It might be a made - up tale in local gossip, or some misinformation spread on the internet.
The claim that the New York Times publishes 'fake stories' is a controversial one. While the paper has made errors in the past like any media outlet, calling it a purveyor of 'fake stories' is a broad generalization. However, some may argue that during highly politicized times, certain stories' interpretations could be seen as skewed by some. But overall, the New York Times has a reputation for fact - checking and journalistic integrity built over a long time.
Look for multiple sources. If the NYT story is the only one reporting something in a certain way, it could be suspect. But this isn't always conclusive as they may break a story first.