It could mean that there are no fabricated or made - up 'emergancies' that are supposedly based on real events. Maybe it's emphasizing the importance of dealing with only real - life emergency situations and not creating false ones under the guise of being based on truth.
It might be a rather unclear statement. But perhaps it means there should be no made - up 'emergencies' in something that is supposed to be based on a true story. In other words, when you claim a story is based on truth, you can't fabricate emergency situations for the sake of drama or to mislead the audience.
Sure. In disaster relief, when a hurricane has actually hit a region, the response is based on the real situation of that hurricane - damaged area. There's no made - up elements added to the emergency situation. Another example could be in a real - life medical emergency in a hospital. The doctors and nurses deal with the actual symptoms and conditions of the patient, not some fictional situation inspired by a similar real case but distorted.
Consider a non - fiction book about a political crisis in a country. The protests, the government's actions, and the resulting chaos are all real - life emergencies that are being reported without any fictional elements. In a similar vein, a film about a real - life epidemic outbreak would show the real spread of the disease, the shortage of medical supplies, and the efforts to contain it, without adding any fictional emergencies like a zombie - like transformation of the patients which has no basis in reality.
I think 'The Time Machine' by H. G. Wells can be considered. The Time Traveller goes to the future and discovers a world in an emergency state due to the evolution of humanity into two very different species. It's a thought - provoking look at how society can change and face emergencies. 'The War of the Worlds' by the same author is also interesting. It's about an alien invasion which is a huge emergency for the human race. The way the people react and try to survive is very engaging. And 'The Handmaid's Tale' by Margaret Atwood, while more about a social and political emergency, is really interesting as it shows a dystopian future where women's rights are severely restricted.
One such book is 'The Day of the Triffids' by John Wyndham. It's about a world suddenly plunged into chaos when most of humanity is blinded and giant, man - eating plants start to take over. Another is 'Station Eleven' by Emily St. John Mandel, which tells the story of a post - apocalyptic world after a flu pandemic wipes out a large portion of the population. And 'World War Z' by Max Brooks is also great. It's a fictional account of a global zombie war and how different countries deal with the emergency situation.
Sure. Fiction can be based on a true story. Think about historical fiction. Writers take a period in history that actually happened and create fictional characters within that setting. It's a way to bring history to life in a more engaging way. A lot of movies are like this too. They might be based on a true crime or a real - life adventure, but with some fictionalized elements for the sake of entertainment.
Yes, it can. Many works of fiction draw inspiration from real - life events or people. For example, 'The Great Gatsby' has elements that are based on the Jazz Age society that F. Scott Fitzgerald was a part of. Authors often take a true story and then use their creativity to add fictional elements like different character traits, altered plot lines, or fictional settings to make it a more engaging and unique fictional work.
Halloween is mostly fiction. It's a holiday filled with spooky elements and traditions that are created for entertainment and fun rather than being rooted in real events.