Checking the New York Times archives could also be a great way. They may have a collection of subway stories over the years. You might find some hidden gems from the past that are really interesting. Archives often have a wealth of information that is not always on the front page.
One horror story is about a sudden power outage in the subway. People were trapped in the pitch - black carriages. There were screams and panic. Some thought they would never get out. Another is when a fight broke out between two groups of rowdy passengers. It got really violent with people getting punched and kicked right there on the subway platform.
Yes, they are. They show real - life examples of love, which can inspire readers to believe in love and pursue their own relationships. The stories of how people find love against all odds can be very motivating.
One example could be some of its reporting on certain political events where the facts were later found to be misrepresented. For instance, in a story about a policy implementation, they might have exaggerated the negative impacts without fully considering all the aspects and data available at the time.
There are some who think that the NYT's coverage of political campaigns contains 'fake stories'. For instance, during an election, if a story is published about a candidate's past actions that doesn't align with the way a particular group wants to view the candidate. But in reality, the NYT is reporting based on sources and evidence. They may not always get it 100% right, but it's not fair to simply label it as 'fake'.
The 'ny times 2019 cemetery stories' might feature stories about cemetery maintenance and the people who take care of cemeteries. There could be accounts of restoration projects of old graves in 2019. It may also include stories of how cemeteries are used for remembrance and as a place for the community to gather, perhaps for commemorative events in that year.
Look for lack of multiple reliable sources. If a story in the NY Times is based on just one or two sketchy sources, it could be false. For example, if it's a big expose but only quotes anonymous sources that can't be verified.
Yes. For instance, the story of an athlete who uses their platform to promote social change is inspiring. They might be advocating for equality in sports, regardless of gender or race, and through their actions, they are making a real difference both in the sports world and in society at large.
Look for multiple sources. If the NYT story is the only one reporting something in a certain way, it could be suspect. But this isn't always conclusive as they may break a story first.
Another horror story is about a malfunctioning subway door. A passenger was standing near the door when it suddenly opened while the train was in motion. The person almost fell out onto the tracks. Thankfully, some other passengers were quick enough to grab him. Also, I've heard of a case where a deranged individual set off a small fire in a subway car. The smoke filled the car quickly, causing panic among the passengers. They had to try to break the windows to get fresh air while waiting for help to arrive.