One example could be some of its reporting on certain political events where the facts were later found to be misrepresented. For instance, in a story about a policy implementation, they might have exaggerated the negative impacts without fully considering all the aspects and data available at the time.
Look for lack of multiple reliable sources. If a story in the NY Times is based on just one or two sketchy sources, it could be false. For example, if it's a big expose but only quotes anonymous sources that can't be verified.
Yes, they are. They show real - life examples of love, which can inspire readers to believe in love and pursue their own relationships. The stories of how people find love against all odds can be very motivating.
There are some who think that the NYT's coverage of political campaigns contains 'fake stories'. For instance, during an election, if a story is published about a candidate's past actions that doesn't align with the way a particular group wants to view the candidate. But in reality, the NYT is reporting based on sources and evidence. They may not always get it 100% right, but it's not fair to simply label it as 'fake'.
The 'ny times 2019 cemetery stories' might feature stories about cemetery maintenance and the people who take care of cemeteries. There could be accounts of restoration projects of old graves in 2019. It may also include stories of how cemeteries are used for remembrance and as a place for the community to gather, perhaps for commemorative events in that year.
Yes. For instance, the story of an athlete who uses their platform to promote social change is inspiring. They might be advocating for equality in sports, regardless of gender or race, and through their actions, they are making a real difference both in the sports world and in society at large.
Look for multiple sources. If the NYT story is the only one reporting something in a certain way, it could be suspect. But this isn't always conclusive as they may break a story first.
I'm not sure specifically as I don't have the current list of 'ny times most read stories' at hand. But generally, they could include political news, international events, stories about scientific breakthroughs, and human - interest features.
There have been cases where the New York Times has reported inaccurate details about international events. For example, in stories related to conflicts in some Middle Eastern countries, they might have relied on sources with their own agendas, resulting in false stories. This can mislead the public's understanding of the complex geopolitical situations there.
Check if your browser has a built - in pop - up blocker. For example, in Chrome, you can go to Settings, then Privacy and security, and make sure the 'Block pop - ups' option is enabled. This might prevent the pop - ups when you're reading NY Times stories. Also, some browsers allow you to set exceptions for certain sites. So if you want to allow other pop - ups from different sites but not NY Times, you can configure that.