does kid kill gene in true story

There is no such general situation in real life where a 'kid' can directly 'kill' a 'gene' in the literal sense. Genes are part of our biological makeup and can be affected by various factors like mutations, environmental influences, and diseases, but not by a kid in a murderous way.

I don't think so. Usually, such extreme and disturbing scenarios are rare in true stories involving kids.

Typically, no. Genes are part of our genetic code and are influenced by things like inheritance, environmental factors, and random mutations. A kid isn't capable of causing harm to a gene in the sense of directly attacking or destroying it. While a kid's lifestyle choices in the future might influence gene expression, it's not the same as harming a gene in a traditional sense. So in a true story, it's very improbable.

In many true stories, the fate of a character like Gene could vary. Maybe it's a mystery that unfolds as the story progresses, or maybe it's clearly stated. But we need to know more details to be sure.

Yes, Gene died in the true story.

No, Gene doesn't die in the true story.

No, Gene doesn't die. The story has a different outcome for him.

No, it's likely fictional. Most stories like this are made up for entertainment or to convey a certain message.

I'm not sure. It depends on which true story you're referring to. Maybe you could give me more details?

Yes. There are unfortunately some true stories where a child has committed a heinous act of killing a girl. For example, in some cases of extreme abuse or mental instability in a child, they may act out violently. However, such cases are extremely rare and often shock the community due to the unexpected nature of a child being involved in such a serious crime.