new york times review marriage story

The review could also mention the theme of self - discovery within the context of a marriage. As the characters go through the divorce process, they also learn more about themselves. The New York Times might discuss how the film presents this journey of self - discovery as an important part of the overall story.

One key point could be the portrayal of the complex relationship between the two main characters. The review might mention how the film delved deep into the emotional rollercoaster of a marriage falling apart.

The review in The New York Times may discuss the acting performances in Marriage Story. The actors might be praised for their ability to convey complex emotions such as love, anger, and sadness during the divorce process. Their on - screen chemistry, even in the midst of a relationship falling apart, could be a significant aspect of the review.

Well, from what I've read in the New York Times review of Marriage Story, one important aspect is the authenticity of the relationship depicted. The review probably discusses how the movie makes the audience feel as if they are witnessing a real - life marriage in turmoil. Also, the cinematography and how it sets the mood for the story, whether it's the use of light and color to reflect the characters' emotions, could be key points in the review.

The review may point out that the actors' chemistry is palpable. They are able to show the love that once was between the characters as well as the growing animosity during the divorce process. Their ability to switch between different emotions seamlessly is a key factor in the movie's success.

Well, one important aspect in the NYT review of 'Marriage Story' could be the direction. The way the director frames the story, perhaps using close - up shots to intensify the emotional moments between the characters. Also, the review might discuss the film's exploration of love and loss within the context of a marriage ending. It might compare it to other movies about relationships to show its uniqueness.

The New York Times review of 'Marriage Story' may have focused on several aspects. Firstly, it could have talked about how the movie delved deep into the characters' psyches. The lead actors' portrayals were so nuanced that it made the story feel very real. Secondly, the review might have mentioned the film's pacing. It didn't seem rushed, allowing the audience to fully experience each stage of the marriage's dissolution. Additionally, the movie's use of dialogue was probably praised. The conversations between the characters were so raw and honest, which added to the overall authenticity of the story. It's a movie that doesn't shy away from showing the ugly as well as the beautiful parts of a relationship, and the review may have highlighted this aspect as well.

The review might say the acting in 'Marriage Story' is superb. The actors likely brought the characters to life in a very believable way.

The New York Times review of Marriage Story probably delves into the characters' relationships with each other. It could examine how the main couple interacts with their families and friends during this difficult time. It may also analyze the emotional states of the characters, like the moments of anger, sadness, and hope, and how well the actors bring these emotions to life on screen. This helps the audience understand the characters better and see the full picture of the marriage story.

The New York Times often has in - depth reviews of historical fiction. These reviews can be a great resource for readers. They might discuss how well the author has re - created a particular historical period, whether the characters seem believable within that context, and the overall quality of the writing. For example, a review might praise a book for its meticulous research into a little - known historical event and how it weaves that into an engaging story.