Literary criticism in detective fiction serves multiple purposes. One key aspect is its role in evaluating the use of language. Detectives often have a distinct way of speaking and thinking, and literary criticism can analyze how this is presented. For instance, Sherlock Holmes' logical deductions are expressed in a very particular style of language. Moreover, it helps in assessing the impact of detective fiction on society. These stories can reflect social values, fears, and concerns. By critiquing detective fiction, we can gain insights into the cultural context in which they were written and how they might have influenced or been influenced by the society at large.
Literary criticism affects the interpretation of detective fiction in several ways. Firstly, it can analyze the narrative devices used. In detective fiction, things like flashbacks, unreliable narrators, and multiple perspectives are common. Criticism helps in understanding how these devices are used to build suspense and mislead the reader. Secondly, it can explore the cultural references within the story. Detective fiction often makes references to the society in which it was written, and literary criticism can unpack these references, giving a deeper understanding of the story's meaning. Thirdly, it can evaluate the overall significance of the detective story within the broader literary canon.
Literature criticism and literary criticism were both ways of evaluating and analyzing literary works, but the focus and perspective were slightly different.
Literature criticism refers to the subjective evaluation and analysis of literary works, mainly focusing on the characteristics and contents of literary works in terms of ideology, art, culture, etc., emphasizing the interpretation and understanding of the works themselves. Critists would use various methods such as reading, thinking, discussion, and analysis to conduct in-depth exploration and evaluation of works.
Literature criticism, on the other hand, paid more attention to the analysis of the social, historical, and cultural background of literary works, as well as the author's intention, purpose, and creative process. The criticism mainly focused on the meaning, value, and influence of the work, emphasizing the evaluation of the relationship between the work and the era, society, history, and culture. Critiques tended to focus on being objective and fair, avoiding the interference of subjective colors.
Therefore, the main difference between literary criticism and literary criticism lies in the focus of evaluation and analysis. One is the interpretation and understanding of the work itself, and the other is the evaluation of the relationship between the work and the times, society, and culture.
Literature criticism is a literary activity that reviews and analyses literary works, usually including their content, form, style, theme, symbolism, and language techniques, and exploring the social, cultural, and political impacts of these works. The purpose of literary criticism is to help readers better understand literary works and to discover and appreciate the beauty and meaning in literary works.
A literary review was a type of literary criticism that was an analysis of literary works. Literature criticism would usually focus on a particular literary work or discuss its literary style, theme, structure, language, and other characteristics and advantages. The purpose of literary criticism is to let readers better understand literary works and promote the development and prosperity of literature.
Literature criticism referred to the process of evaluating and criticizing literary works. The standards mainly include the following aspects:
1. aesthetic standards: literary critics need to evaluate and criticize the artistic value and aesthetic value of literary works according to the readers 'aesthetic tastes and cultural background.
2. Depth of Thought: A literary critic needs to make an in-depth evaluation and criticism of the thoughts, emotions, and values expressed in a literary work to judge the meaning and extension of the work.
3. Language skills: A literary critic needs to evaluate and criticize the language, rhetorical devices, and style of a literary work to judge the literary level and artistic value of the work.
4. Achievement and influence: literary critics need to evaluate and criticize the historical status and influence of literary works to judge the status and value of works in the history of literature.
5. Reader's response: A literary critic needs to evaluate and criticize the reader's response and acceptance of a literary work to determine the value and status of the work in the reader's heart.
The standard of literary criticism was multi-dimensional. It needed to consider the internal and external factors of the work to judge the artistic value and literary value of the work.
Literature criticism refers to the evaluation, analysis, and interpretation of literary works. The main methods included:
1. Historical criticism: analyzing and evaluating the historical background, author, era, culture, etc. of literary works.
2. Philosophic criticism: Using philosophical theories such as logic and cognitive science to explore and evaluate the thoughts, emotions, and values of literary works.
3. Esthetics criticism: By analyzing and evaluating the form, language, structure, and theme of literary works, we can explore the beauty and value of literature.
4. Positive criticism: By collecting and analyzing literature materials, readers 'comments, market feedback, and other information, the quality and value of literary works can be measured.
5. Cultural criticism: to analyze and evaluate literary works and the social, political, historical, psychological and other aspects of a specific cultural background.
6. Interdisciplinary criticism: Combining knowledge and skills from multiple disciplines to conduct comprehensive research and evaluation of literary works.
These methods can help literary critics understand and evaluate literary works more comprehensively and deeply.
The thinking of literary criticism refers to the way of thinking and analytical methods used by literary critics to evaluate literary works. The following are some of the characteristics of literary criticism:
1. System: When literary critics criticize, they usually evaluate the whole work and analyze it from multiple angles to form a systematic analysis framework.
2. Criticality: When evaluating a work, literary critics must not only affirm its merits but also point out its shortcomings and shortcomings, and analyze and criticize them.
3. Historicity: When literary critics criticized, they would usually consider the background of the era and social background of the work and analyze its influence on later generations.
4. Culturality: When evaluating a work, literary critics should not only take into account the content of the work itself, but also take into account the cultural environment and cultural background reflected by the work and carry out cultural thinking and evaluation.
5. Pluralism: When literary critics criticize, they usually use a variety of analytical methods and perspectives to broaden their vision of the work.
6. Subjectivity: When literary critics criticize, they usually have a certain degree of subjective evaluation based on personal preferences and aesthetic concepts.
The thinking of literary criticism is systematic, critical, historical, cultural, pluralistic, subjective and so on. It can help readers better understand the meaning and extension of literary works and promote the development and progress of literature.
Literature criticism refers to the process of evaluating, analyzing, and explaining literary works. Its principles and standards usually include the following aspects:
1. Objectivity: literary criticism should maintain an objective attitude and evaluate literary works impartially. A critic should take facts as the basis, and the content and ideology of literary works as the research object.
2. Value neutrality: literary criticism should not take the value of literary works as the only standard of evaluation, but should take literature itself as the research object. Criticists should consider the artistic characteristics, language style, and ideology of the literature itself, rather than the author's background, status, reputation, and other factors.
3. textualism: literary criticism should focus on the content of the text of literary works rather than the author's identity, status, reputation and other factors. The critics should consider the language structure, language usage, story plot and other factors of the text itself rather than the author's thoughts, cultural background and other factors.
Logicality: Literature criticism should follow the principle of logic to analyze and explain literary works. Critists should analyze and explain literary works based on facts and logical reasoning.
5. Pluralism: literary criticism should respect the principle of pluralism and should not evaluate literary works with a single standard. Critists should evaluate literary works from various angles and standards in order to achieve a more comprehensive, objective and accurate evaluation of literary works.
Literature criticism referred to the process of commenting and evaluating literary works. Its basic purpose was to promote the development of literature and improve the quality of literature.
Writing literary criticism usually included the following steps:
1. Target of criticism: specify the literary works or series of works to be criticized.
2. Analysis of the object of criticism: An in-depth analysis of the object of criticism includes the background of the author, the era of the work, the cultural background, the plot, the characters, and so on.
3. Decide on the direction of criticism: According to the analysis results, determine the direction of criticism, such as commenting on the content of the work, artistic techniques, structural arrangements, theme significance, etc.
4. Explain your critical point of view: In criticism, you must fully explain your critical point of view and use appropriate language and evidence to prove your point of view.
5. Analyzing the effect of criticism: analyzing the effect of criticism, including the response of the audience and the impact on the work.
6. Make suggestions for improvement: Make suggestions for improvement according to the effect of criticism in order to improve the quality of literature.
In the process of writing, the critics should pay attention to being objective, fair and scientific, avoid subjective assumptions and prejudice, and pay attention to the use of language expression and rhetoric skills so that readers can better understand and accept the criticism.