One characteristic is the sense of adventure. His spy novels often have the protagonist in thrilling situations, like being chased across different terrains. For example, in 'The Thirty - Nine Steps', the hero is constantly on the run, which keeps the reader on the edge of their seat.
There are also characters like Sandy Arbuthnot in some of his novels. Sandy is often a sidekick or a co - adventurer, bringing his own set of skills and charm to the story.
One of the best is 'The Thirty - Nine Steps'. It's a thrilling adventure story full of mystery and espionage. The main character, Richard Hannay, finds himself in the middle of a dangerous conspiracy, which makes for a really exciting read.
The plots in John Buchan's historical novels are usually fast - paced. There are constant twists and turns that keep the readers on the edge of their seats. He combines historical facts with fictional elements in a seamless way, so that the readers can not only enjoy the story but also learn something about history.
Sure. 'The Thirty - Nine Steps' is a top pick. It's a classic adventure novel that has been very influential in the genre. It has a fast - paced plot and a likable hero in Richard Hannay.
Another great work is 'Greenmantle'. This novel delves into the complex geopolitical situation during World War I, with elements of espionage and adventure. The descriptions of different cultures and the political climate of the time are very interesting.
It's hard to give an exact number. Some of his popular novels like 'The Thirty-Nine Steps' have been adapted, but the total is relatively small. It also depends on which versions and remakes you count.
Some of the main themes include adventure, heroism, and the struggle between good and evil. Buchan often sets his stories in exciting locations, and his characters face various challenges that test their courage and moral fiber.
Well, that's a tricky question. The number of steps might vary depending on the plot and structure of the particular John Buchan novel. Maybe you could provide more context?