Since I don't know the exact nature of this story, it's difficult to say. It might be a story related to some unique cultural or fictional context that is not widely known.
I haven't come across it. It could be a story that is specific to a particular region or sub - culture, so not many people in general might be aware of it.
Rather than focusing on specific stories which can be inappropriate to share in detail, it's crucial to understand the broader aspects of gay relationships. The first time engaging in any sexual act often involves building trust with a partner. It might start with a deep emotional connection and a sense of exploration. And safety in terms of using protection and being aware of sexual health is always a priority.
I'm not sure specifically what a'straight to cock sucker story' is as it's not a common or well - known phrase. It might be something very specific within a certain group or an idiosyncratic expression.
First, they should ensure it's consensual. Both parties must be fully willing. Second, they need to be well - informed about sexual health, like using protection. Third, they should be in a comfortable and private environment.
I'm not sure what specific'my kept cock sucker story' you are referring to. It could be a very personal or fictional account that only the person who created the term knows the details.
There's not enough information provided to really say what this 'swallow jock cock story' is about. It could be a story created by an individual with their own unique set of characters and events. Maybe 'jock' refers to an athlete and'swallow' could be some sort of action related to a bird or a metaphorical action, but without more context it's just speculation.
The origin of the'straight to cock sucker story' is a mystery. It doesn't seem to be related to any mainstream or well - documented linguistic trends. It might be a local or personal creation that has not spread widely enough for its origin to be known. It could potentially be a humorous or shock - value term that emerged in a very specific context, but without more information, we can't be sure.