Another similarity might be in the characters. King Arthur is a central and iconic character in his tales, representing leadership and a certain set of values. In Pulp Fiction, characters like Vincent Vega and Jules Winnfield are also very iconic. They have their own codes and values (although very different from Arthur's chivalry). These characters drive the stories forward and are memorable in their own right, much like King Arthur in his legend.
It's a bit of both. While there may have been a real person named Arthur who was a leader in some capacity, over time, his story has been embellished with fictional elements. The Arthurian legends grew over centuries, with different writers adding their own creative touches. So, the basic idea of a leader named Arthur could be based on fact, but the elaborate tales we know today are mostly fictional.
The question of whether King Arthur was real or fiction is a complex one. Some historians believe that there may have been a real figure at the heart of the Arthurian legends. However, the stories as we know them today are filled with elements such as Merlin the wizard, the Holy Grail, and magic swords, which are clearly fictional. Over time, these fictional elements have become so intertwined with the story that it's hard to separate fact from fiction. So, in conclusion, while there might have been a kernel of truth, for the most part King Arthur is a fictional creation.
Most historians consider King Arthur to be a fictional character. There's no solid historical evidence to prove his existence as depicted in the legends.
King Arthur is fiction. The accounts of him involve fantastical elements like magic and heroic quests that are more characteristic of fictional narratives than actual history.
King Arthur is mostly considered fiction. There are many elements in the King Arthur stories that are clearly fictional, such as the magic sword Excalibur, the wizard Merlin, and the Lady of the Lake. These elements are part of the rich tapestry of Arthurian legend that has been passed down through the ages in literature and oral tradition.
The concept of a quest from King Arthur can also be used. Instead of a knight searching for the Holy Grail, in a Pulp Fiction - inspired story, a character could be on a quest to find a lost suitcase full of something valuable (similar to the mysterious briefcase in Pulp Fiction). Along the way, they could face many obstacles and strange characters, just as Arthur's knights faced challenges on their quests.
He's mostly fiction. There's no conclusive historical evidence that points to the existence of a King Arthur exactly as described in the legends. The stories are full of magical and mythical elements that are not typical of historical accounts.
It's a combination of both. Some aspects of the King Arthur story might have been based on real events or people, but over time, it's been embellished and fictionalized to become the epic tale we know today. So, it's not strictly fact or fiction.