Fiction. Consider this, in all of our exploration of the oceans, which is still not complete but quite extensive, we have not found any conclusive evidence of mermaids. The idea of a half - human, half - fish creature goes against the known biological principles. For a mermaid to exist as commonly depicted, it would require a very strange and unlikely combination of mammalian and fish - like characteristics that have no basis in evolutionary biology.
Fiction. If we look at the history of mermaid claims, they are always based on something that can be rationally explained away. The new evidence, whatever it may be, probably falls into the same category. It could be a case of people seeing what they want to see or misidentifying something ordinary as a mermaid. There's no real evidence to suggest that these mythical creatures actually exist.
Fact. There has been new evidence emerging over time that supports the existence of megalodon in the past. Fossil records are a major part of this evidence. These fossils show the large size of their teeth and some skeletal remains which give us an idea of their massive size and structure. Also, studies on ancient ocean ecosystems suggest that an apex predator like megalodon could have thrived in those conditions.
Well, mermaids are fiction. While there have been many reported sightings over the years, these can be attributed to misidentifications. For example, sailors in the past might have seen manatees or dugongs from a distance and, due to the long periods at sea and the power of imagination, thought they were mermaids. Also, mermaids are a common theme in fictional stories, like 'The Little Mermaid', which further shows their fictional nature.
The main new evidence is from improved fossil analysis. Scientists are now able to extract more information from megalodon teeth and bones. For example, they can study the chemical composition to understand what the megalodon ate. Another type of new evidence comes from advanced geological studies. By looking at the layers of rock where megalodon fossils are found, they can determine the time period more accurately and also understand the environmental conditions at that time.
Evolution is a fact. Evidence includes fossil records which display a clear sequence of life forms over time. For instance, the discovery of Archaeopteryx, a creature with both reptilian and avian features, is strong evidence for evolution.
Regarding evidence for Moses, religious texts are a major source. The detailed accounts in the Torah, for instance, are seen as evidence by believers. But from a scientific and archaeological perspective, it's more complex. There are no inscriptions or artifacts that directly name Moses. However, some historians believe that the general story of a group of people leaving Egypt could be based on real events. And if there were such an event, it's likely there was a leader, which could be Moses. So, the evidence is not conclusive either way.
Most likely fiction. There is no scientific evidence to prove the existence of mermaids. While there are many myths and legends about them, these are likely the result of sailors mistaking manatees or other sea creatures for half - human, half - fish beings.
Yes, time travel might be a fact. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, time dilation occurs. For example, astronauts on the International Space Station age slightly slower than people on Earth due to their high - speed movement relative to Earth. This shows that time can be affected by factors like speed and gravity, which is a form of time - related distortion similar to what we might consider time travel on a very small scale.
Evidence for it being fiction lies in the movie - specific elements. The idea of a love story that unfolds so perfectly during a disaster is more of a creative concept. On the other hand, the fact that there were people of different classes on the Titanic means relationships could have formed. But the elaborate and fictional details of the movie's love story, such as the grand gestures and the specific character backgrounds, are not based on historical fact.