One characteristic is accurate historical details. For example, in 'Gone with the Wind', Margaret Mitchell did extensive research on the American Civil War era, which made the story feel very authentic. Another is engaging characters. In 'The Book Thief' by Markus Zusak, the characters are so well - developed that readers can really connect with them.
To review historical fiction, first consider the historical accuracy. Check if the details of the time period, such as clothing, social norms, and events, are well - researched. Then look at the characters. Are they believable and complex? Their development should be engaging. Also, assess the plot. It should be interesting and flow well, perhaps with some twists related to the historical context. The writing style matters too. Is it easy to read and does it bring the historical setting to life?
One great historical fiction with good reviews is 'The Pillars of the Earth' by Ken Follett. It vividly depicts the building of a cathedral in 12th - century England. The story is full of rich characters and historical details that bring the era to life.
In the realm of scholarly articles on historical fiction, the use of language and its authenticity to the historical period is examined. The choice of words, dialects, and idioms can either enhance or detract from the historical setting. Take 'Gone with the Wind' for example. Margaret Mitchell's use of the Southern dialect of the United States during the Civil War era adds a layer of authenticity. Moreover, the representation of different social classes in historical fiction is another area of study. How the upper, middle, and lower classes are depicted in relation to the historical context can tell us a lot about the author's perspective and the overall message of the work.
The New York Times often has in - depth reviews of historical fiction. These reviews can be a great resource for readers. They might discuss how well the author has re - created a particular historical period, whether the characters seem believable within that context, and the overall quality of the writing. For example, a review might praise a book for its meticulous research into a little - known historical event and how it weaves that into an engaging story.
The most important element is historical accuracy. Incorrect historical facts can take you out of the story. Next, character development. You want to see the characters grow and change within the historical setting. And the plot. It should be engaging and make you care about what happens. Also, the language. It should be appropriate for the time period being depicted, or at least not feel out of place.
Kirkus Review evaluates historical fiction based on its historical accuracy. If the events, settings, and details of the time period are well - represented, it gets a plus. For example, if a book about the American Revolution has accurate descriptions of battles and the political climate of that time, it's on the right track.
It's a remarkable piece of historical fiction. The book vividly depicts the horrors of war. It shows the brutal reality faced by soldiers on the Western Front during World War I. The characters are well - developed, and you really get a sense of their fear, camaraderie, and disillusionment.
One great starred review historical fiction is 'The Book Thief' by Markus Zusak. It tells a story about a young girl in Nazi Germany and her love for books during a dark time. Another is 'All the Light We Cannot See' which beautifully weaves together the stories of a blind French girl and a German boy during World War II.
There are many great works in Kirkus Review historical fiction. 'A Gentleman in Moscow' is one such example. It follows the life of a count who is under house arrest in a hotel in Moscow over several decades. The book does an excellent job of portraying different historical events and the changing society in Russia during that time. 'The Alice Network' is also notable. It weaves together two timelines, one during World War I and the other after World War II, and tells a story of female spies and their contributions to history.