It's a rather unclear statement. 'For king and country' is an old - fashioned patriotic phrase. But 'loves to blame story' doesn't seem to be a common or correct English expression. It could be a very creative or misphrased idea. Maybe it was intended to say something like 'For king and country, there is a story of blame' but it's hard to be certain without more context.
In historical context, 'for king and country' was a powerful statement of loyalty. But 'loves to blame story' doesn't have an obvious historical significance. It might be a modern - day misinterpretation or a very local and unrecorded phrase. Historically, loyalty to the king and country was about military service, paying taxes, and following laws. There's no clear connection to a 'blame story' within the traditional understanding of 'for king and country' so it may be a new or misconstrued concept.
Maybe there is a young soldier who is deeply loyal to the king and country. However, he meets a woman who changes his perspective. There could also be an older advisor or nobleman in the story who tries to uphold the values of the kingdom and sees the soldier's love as a threat to the stability of the king's rule. These are just speculations as the story is not familiar to me.
I'm not sure specifically as I haven't read this exact story. But generally, it might be about how love causes conflicts or sacrifices in the context of serving the king and the country.
In this story, the king might blame a character who he perceives as having betrayed him or failed to fulfill their duties. It's possible that it's a close confidant or a foreign power.
Since the 'for king and countrys love to blame story' is not a well - known common story title, it's difficult to give a definite account. It might be a story set in a historical context where characters have a deep love for their king and country. This love might put them in situations where they are blamed for actions they may or may not have committed. For instance, a noble who tries to protect the king's reputation but ends up being blamed for a scandal that was actually the work of the king's enemies. Without further information, we can only make these general assumptions.
As I haven't heard of this particular 'for king and countrys love to blame story' before, it's hard to explain the plot. However, generally speaking, it might be a story where a character's loyalty to the king and country is so strong that they are willing to bear the blame for actions that are misconstrued as harmful to the nation or the monarch. For example, if there is a crisis in the kingdom and a scapegoat is needed, a person with this kind of extreme loyalty might step forward and accept the blame out of love for king and country.
King Zhou's fatuity was not the only reason for his failure. Some articles and opinions believed that King Zhou's failure was because the era had developed to a certain stage. The contradiction between the concentration of royal power and the power of nobles became increasingly sharp, and King Zhou's actions were only the result of the development of the times. In addition, some articles pointed out that King Zhou was not really fatuous and unreasonable, but was misunderstood by later generations. These people believed that King Zhou was a smart and resourceful monarch with extraordinary physical strength. He was good at using troops and left behind outstanding military achievements. Therefore, there was no clear answer to the question of whether King Zhou was fatuous.
Maybe it's a reference to a historical king who had an unorthodox love for creative writing and modern scholars or storytellers have decided to portray him as a fan of fanfiction in a more contemporary retelling. However, without more context, it's really hard to determine exactly who this king is.