Definitely not. Stories like this go against basic moral and ethical values in society, as it may involve coercion or inappropriate sexual behavior which is unacceptable.
How about 'The story of when the wife is gone, and a forceful element (the bull) causes the husband to be in a tough spot (implied by suck).' This tries to make more sense of the original odd phrase while still keeping the basic ideas it might be trying to convey.
No. Such content involves vulgar and inappropriate sexual themes that are not suitable for public discussion or creation in most moral and ethical frameworks.
This is completely inappropriate and violates moral and ethical norms. Such content involves vulgar and improper behavior that is not suitable for public discussion.
No, it's not a very common phrase. It's rather specific and would only be used in contexts where there is a particular interest in the husband's relationship with a rooster and the wife's act of sharing that story.
This phrase is quite puzzling. It might be a story that involves the wife leaving and then some situation arising for the husband that is symbolized by the 'bull' and whatever the'suck' part is supposed to mean. It could also be a misphrasing of something else. If it's from a specific region or community, they might have their own understanding of these words in relation to a story, but from a general perspective, it's very difficult to say precisely what it means.
This kind of question assumes an unhealthy dynamic. A wife's actions in a relationship are based on love, connection, and her own comfort, not an obligation to perform such acts whenever the husband desires.
There is no information indicating that 'Cock Suck on Vacation' is a real story. It might be just a random and inappropriate phrase someone made up. We should focus on positive and respectful stories and topics.