In 'The Good Nurse', the facts are the real - life cases of patient harm that were discovered. It's a fact that there was a healthcare professional involved in these heinous acts. As for the fiction part, perhaps in the way the story is presented to heighten the suspense. The movie or book might take some liberties with the timelines of events or how certain characters other than the main perpetrator are portrayed. However, the main fact that a nurse was responsible for multiple patient deaths cannot be overlooked.
Well, one fact could be the real - life events that inspired the story. Fiction might be added drama for entertainment. For example, real medical procedures might be accurately depicted (fact), while some personal relationships could be exaggerated (fiction).
In terms of character development, in fiction, 'The Good Nurse' can be a stereotype with certain expected traits. They might be overly selfless or have some dark secret that drives the plot. In truth, nurses are real people with a wide range of personalities. Real nurses may show kindness and professionalism, but also have normal human flaws and emotions that don't always fit into the neat fictional boxes. A real - life 'good nurse' may be dealing with burnout or personal issues while still trying to do their job well.
In 'The Good Nurse', distinguishing facts from fiction can be a bit tricky. Start with the real - life inspiration. If an aspect of the story seems to deviate from what's likely to have happened in a real healthcare and criminal investigation scenario, it's likely fiction. For instance, if a character is shown making impossible leaps in logic during an investigation, that's probably made - up. The facts are the real - life horror of patients being targeted by a nurse. Fiction might be the detailed backstories of some of the characters that are not based on real information but are used to flesh out the story.
Well, one fact in 'The Watcher' could be the general setting which was based on real - life events in a certain neighborhood. Fictionally, some of the more extreme and spooky interactions with the 'Watcher' might be exaggerated for the sake of the story. For example, the menacing letters could have been dramatized in the show compared to what really happened.
Some facts about Apollo 13 are that it really faced a major crisis in space. There was an oxygen tank explosion which endangered the lives of the astronauts. Fiction might be any made - up stories about secret missions during that flight that have no basis in the real events that were documented.
The Chernobyl series contains a lot of facts. For example, the basic events of the Chernobyl disaster like the explosion at the nuclear power plant are real. However, some elements might be fictionalized for the sake of drama. Such as the personal stories of some characters which are created to show the overall impact on people.
One great 'facts vs fiction' book is 'Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind' by Yuval Noah Harari. It separates fact from fiction regarding human evolution and history.
One fact is that war dogs have been used for centuries. However, the fiction part is sometimes they are depicted as being able to understand complex human commands instantly. In truth, it takes a lot of training for them to learn and respond accurately. War dogs are not some kind of robotic entities as they are sometimes made out to be in fictional stories. They are living animals with their own instincts and needs.
I'm not entirely sure what 'hoosiers fact vs fiction' specifically refers to. However, if we assume it's about the Hoosiers in a general sense, perhaps facts could be accurate accounts of their cultural traditions. For example, if there are certain unique Hoosier festivals that have a real history behind them. Fictions might be things like exaggerated tales of Hoosier heroes that have been distorted over time.