Well, perhaps it implies that positive forces or good - natured intentions can sometimes have the effect of silencing a real account. Like when a community wants to uphold a positive image (the good) and in the process, a true but maybe unflattering story gets killed, not in a literal sense but not being allowed to spread.
Sure. In a small town, there is a local hero who has done a lot of good for the community. But he has a dark secret from his past. The townspeople love him so much and consider all the good he does now. So they turn a blind eye to rumors about his past, effectively 'killing' the true story because they don't want to believe it and want to preserve the good image of their hero.
To be honest, I don't know. You might need to do some research or read reviews to find out if there's any truth to it. Maybe it's a blend of fact and imagination.
Yes, 'Good Kill' is based on true occurrences. It takes cues from actual events and presents them in a cinematic way, while still maintaining a connection to the truth.
I think it has its merits. The fact that it's based on a true story gives it an extra layer of authenticity. The acting is solid and the cinematography does a great job of creating the moody atmosphere. But it's not for everyone. Those who are squeamish about violence or adult - themed content might not enjoy it as much.
One example could be in a war movie based on a true story. A sniper makes a long - range shot to take out a high - value enemy target who was planning a major attack. This is a 'good kill' as it saved many lives. Another example might be in a fishing community. A fisherman catches a large shark that has been preying on local fish stocks and endangering swimmers. Catching and removing the shark could be considered a 'good kill' in the context of protecting the local ecosystem.
There could be a few reasons. It could be that the story doesn't fit the newspaper's political stance or editorial focus. Or perhaps they got pressured by external influences to downplay it.