One possible hole could be inconsistent timelines. If she's given different timeframes for the alleged events at different times, that's a big red flag. It makes it hard to trust the overall narrative as it seems less reliable.
Well, some might consider the 'holes' to be related to the verification of evidence. In Tara Reade's story, if the evidence she presents can't be independently verified, like documents or recordings that are supposed to support her claims but are either missing or unauthentic. Another aspect could be the motivation behind her coming forward. If there are suspicions that she has ulterior motives, like political gain or personal vendetta, that can also create holes in the overall believability of her story.
I'm not entirely sure specifically about the 'holes in story' regarding Tara Reade without more context. It could refer to inconsistencies or gaps in a narrative she has presented. Maybe there are parts of her account that don't seem to add up or lack evidence to support them fully.
One way to identify the 'holes in story' is to look for inconsistent statements. If Tara Reade says one thing at one time and then something different later, that's a sign. For example, if she changes details about when or how an event occurred.
They can lead to a divided public perception. Some may focus on the holes and dismiss her story, while others may still believe in her despite the issues, depending on their pre - existing beliefs and biases. For example, those who oppose a certain political figure she is accusing might be more likely to overlook the holes, while those who support the figure will use the holes to discredit her. In general, the holes can make the story seem less reliable and trustworthy in the eyes of the public.
I don't have enough information to say exactly who Tara Reade is in these stories. She could be an ordinary person with an interesting story, or she might be a public figure in a specific community.
Tara Reade's story involves allegations that have sparked significant public attention and discussions. However, the circumstances and evidence surrounding it are complex and controversial.