Fan Xian was flexible in principle and could choose a hard or soft method according to the situation. He was able to get along well in the Qing Kingdom because he could play all kinds of roles well. At the beginning, when he apologized to the Qing Emperor, he had been very sincere. In the end, he received the Qing Emperor's forgiveness. After he found out that Old Li had been blown up, he delivered the medicine in time to show his concern. Fan Xian had asked the Qing Emperor for a response at the family banquet. After the Qing Emperor threw away the commissioner's card, he had firmly refused. He had even beaten Fan Sizhe up when he found out that he was the boss, but when he learned that Fan Sizhe had been framed, he immediately changed his attitude. When Fan Xian was trying to influence Deng Zi Yue, he had been pressing him to face his past self. In short, Fan Xian was flexible and flexible according to the situation. He could stick to his principles and adapt to different situations.
I'd say Jurassic Park leans more towards hard science fiction. It incorporates a lot of real scientific concepts and theories related to genetics and paleontology.
Star Trek is often considered a mix of both hard and soft science fiction. It has elements of advanced technology and scientific concepts that are explored in depth, but also has storylines and characters that focus more on human emotions and social issues.
The difference between Soft Dream and Hard Dream was not explicitly mentioned. Therefore, I don't know how to differentiate between soft and hard stories.
The main difference lies in the role of science. In hard science fiction, the scientific elements are central and drive the plot. They are usually based on current scientific knowledge or plausible extrapolations of it. Soft science fiction doesn't depend as much on scientific rigor. It might take a scientific concept like time travel and use it mainly to create an interesting setting for a story about love, friendship, or power struggles within a society.
Hard science fiction typically focuses on scientific accuracy and often involves advanced concepts from fields like physics, astronomy, or engineering. For example, '2001: A Space Odyssey' delves deep into concepts like space travel and artificial intelligence with a high degree of scientific plausibility. Soft science fiction, on the other hand, may use science more as a backdrop and is more centered around human and social elements. It might explore how society reacts to a scientific discovery rather than the details of the discovery itself.
Soft science fiction typically doesn't rely as much on hard scientific facts. It can be more speculative about the future in terms of how society might change, with only a loose connection to current scientific understanding. It might explore things like new forms of government or how a discovery affects people's beliefs. Hard science fiction is different. It demands a high level of scientific accuracy. Writers of hard science fiction often have a good understanding of fields like physics, biology or astronomy. They use this knowledge to create stories where the science is not just a gimmick but an integral part of the plot. For instance, Arthur C. Clarke's works are full of detailed scientific explanations and his stories are driven by scientific concepts.
Hard science fiction focuses on real scientific concepts and theories, often with detailed explanations and accurate predictions. Soft science fiction, on the other hand, might use science as a backdrop but places more emphasis on characters and social issues.
I think a pail of air is more like soft science fiction. It might focus more on the human experience and emotions related to the concept rather than strict scientific principles.
Hard science fiction focuses on accurate scientific and technical details. Soft science fiction, on the other hand, might use science more as a backdrop and focus more on characters and social themes.