This is a rather strange and inappropriate topic. However, if we look at it in a more general sense, perhaps there could be stories about gay individuals facing discrimination or discomfort in public toilets. But such stories should be about the fight for equal rights and proper facilities rather than any demeaning scenarios.
There are stories about the unique design of Indian toilets. For example, some traditional Indian toilets are squat - style, which is different from the Western - style toilets. These squat - style toilets are designed to be more in line with certain postures that are considered beneficial for human physiology in traditional Indian concepts.
Generally, no. Fictional name puns alone don't typically receive copyright protection. Copyright is more concerned with the overall expression and content of a creative work rather than just a name pun.
There might be a story of how some local initiatives improved the railway toilets. For example, in certain regions, local communities or NGOs took it upon themselves to clean and decorate the railway toilets. They painted beautiful murals on the walls, which not only made the toilets look nicer but also gave a sense of local pride. Passengers were then more likely to keep them clean as well.
Well, in many jungle novels, a common pun could be related to the names of animals. For example, if there's a sly fox character named 'Foxy' and the author plays with the word 'foxy' to mean both the name and the characteristic of being sly. Another could be around the word 'growl' for a growling tiger, and the author might use it in a double - meaning way like 'His growl was not just a sound but a sign of his inner growl (anger or determination).'
Such stories are extremely rare and often considered inappropriate or unethical. It's not a common or acceptable theme in mainstream literature or storytelling.