In general, the James Bond novels provide a richer exploration of Bond's psyche and the political backdrop. Movies, on the other hand, prioritize visual thrills and entertainment value. But both have their charm and appeal to different audiences.
It depends on your perspective. The novels have their own style, but compared to the movies, they might share certain campy traits like larger-than-life villains and daring escapes.
One of the best Roger Moore stories is his time as James Bond. His suave and humorous take on the character was iconic. For example, in 'The Spy Who Loved Me', his Bond had some really cool gadgets and his charm with the female lead was quite memorable.
Sure. In 'Live and Let Die', Roger Moore's Bond had to face off against a voodoo - themed villain. The story had all the elements of a classic Bond movie - action, adventure, and of course, Moore's charm. His Bond was constantly in dangerous situations, like being chased by crocodiles, which made for an exciting story.
The '007 real story' provided the basis for many elements in the James Bond movies. It gave the movies a sense of authenticity in terms of espionage techniques and the international political backdrop.
I'm not sure specifically what the 'Roger Moore Airport Kid Story' is about without more context. It could be a personal anecdote involving Roger Moore and something that happened to a kid at the airport.
One highlight was his Bond career. It made him a global star. Another was his work in other films and shows which showed his range. His charm was also a highlight, it endeared him to audiences.
James Bond is purely fictional. He exists in the realm of imagination, crafted by authors and filmmakers to entertain us with thrilling spy tales and escapades.