No. Smutty content, regardless of the sexual orientation it involves, is not acceptable in high - quality literature. Literature should aim to promote positive values, deep emotions and meaningful themes, not just sexual titillation.
Literature has a wide range of forms and genres. However, works that are overly focused on smutty content, whether it's gay - themed or not, are not regarded as high - quality or acceptable literature. Great literature is about exploring the human condition, relationships, and society in a profound and meaningful way. For example, works like 'Maurice' by E. M. Forster, which is a classic gay - themed novel, explores the social and personal struggles of homosexuals in a very delicate and profound way, without relying on vulgar sexual descriptions.
Sharing or promoting smutty content is not appropriate as it goes against ethical and moral standards. We can focus on positive and healthy LGBTQ+ stories instead, like the story of how some gay couples overcame discrimination to be together and build a happy family.
No. Writing smut fanfic, especially when it involves real people and sexual content, is inappropriate. It violates their privacy and is disrespectful to them as individuals. People should focus on positive and respectful forms of fan engagement, such as creating positive fan art or writing friendly fictional stories about the characters they play.
In the mainstream comics, Venom's sexuality is not defined as gay. His character development is centered around battles and conflicts rather than his sexual orientation.
It depends on the specific comic and its storyline. Sometimes it might be explicitly shown or hinted at, while in others there might be no clear indication.