Pentagon Wars isn't strictly true. It takes some liberties and dramatizes aspects to make for a more engaging narrative. But it does draw inspiration from real events within the defense industry.
It's based on real events to some extent. But like many such stories, there might be some dramatization and creative elements added for narrative purposes.
The 'Pentagon Wars' was about the mismanagement and problems in the development of military projects within the Pentagon. It involved issues like cost overruns, delays, and inefficiencies in getting military equipment developed. For example, the development of some weapon systems took much longer and cost far more than initially planned due to bureaucratic red tape, lack of proper communication between different departments, and over - ambitious designs.
The Pentagon Wars' true story reveals a lot of problems. In the Pentagon, there were issues with how contracts were awarded and managed. There was a lack of proper communication between the military personnel who would actually use the equipment and those in charge of procuring it. For instance, a new military technology project was initiated without fully considering the practicalities of its use in the field. As a result, the equipment developed was not as useful as expected, and huge amounts of money were spent on it, causing a strain on the military budget and hindering the overall military preparedness.
Well, without having read the 'pentagon wars novel' directly, it's hard to say precisely. However, if we think about it generally, it may explore themes such as territorial disputes related to a pentagon - shaped territory. It could also be about ideological wars where the pentagon represents a certain set of beliefs or power structure. Maybe there are heroes and villains in this story, each with their own motives for engaging in the 'wars' described in the novel.
One common fictional element is the idea of all - powerful and all - knowing military leaders. In reality, military decision - making is complex and often involves many people with different views. Another is the over - dramatization of battles. Sometimes, movies or stories make battles seem more epic and one - sided than they really were. Also, there are often fictional portrayals of secret weapons that are supposed to change the course of the war but have no real - world basis.
Well, one way is to look at official reports and documents. If something is documented in military records, it's likely a fact. For example, if there are reports of a specific military operation's budget and its outcomes in official military files, that's a fact. Fiction, on the other hand, might be rumors or unsubstantiated stories that spread without any solid evidence. Maybe some tales about secret super - weapons that have no basis in any official communication.
It might have made the public more aware of the internal workings and potential problems in the Pentagon. People could see that it's not a seamless, perfectly - functioning entity.
I'm not entirely sure which specific 'Bradley True Story' in 'Pentagon Wars' you are referring to. There could be many stories related to Bradley within the context of Pentagon affairs. It might be about a particular military operation, a decision - making process, or an individual's experience.