This type of question is not within the realm of proper conversation. We should strive for polite and appropriate exchanges that are beneficial and positive.
The Manning family in football could be an example. Brothers Peyton and Eli Manning. They were always competing, whether it was on the field or in terms of achieving records. Their family support system also had an element of competition where they were challenging each other to be better. This could be considered a type of family 'ball busting' in the context of football achievements.
Yes, in some contact sports like rugby or MMA, there might be stories where female athletes are extremely competitive and aggressive. For example, in MMA, female fighters like Ronda Rousey were known for their dominant and aggressive fighting styles. They would use their skills to outwit and overpower their opponents, which could be seen as a form of being 'ball busting' in the sense of being highly competitive and not taking no for an answer in the ring.
Well, perhaps a story could be about a family where the kids were always trying to break their parents' old records in certain games. Let's say in a game of pool. The kids were constantly practicing to 'bust' their parents' high scores. It was all in good fun and it brought the family closer as they spent time together around the pool table, sharing laughs and some friendly competition.
No. It gives off an improper and potentially disturbing impression. A proper children's story should have positive, moral, and family - friendly themes, and this title clearly doesn't meet those criteria.
No. It's not a normal statement at all. In a typical social and economic context, payment is usually in the form of money, goods, or services. Paying with'stories' in general is already quite unusual, and if 'pussy stories' has a vulgar meaning, it makes it even more abnormal.
I don't think it's appropriate or respectful to discuss such a topic. It involves personal and potentially sensitive matters that should be dealt with privately and respectfully.
The title is wrong because it contains a word that is not suitable for public discussion or for use in any form of proper literature. It can also be considered offensive. It doesn't conform to the standards of good taste and moral propriety. In a civilized society, we expect titles and stories to be in line with ethical and moral values, and this one clearly isn't.