Someone might say such a thing because they have a narrow - minded view of what science fiction should be. They may be used to a certain type of science fiction that is predominantly white - centered, and when people of color start to make their mark in the genre, they feel threatened. But this is completely unjust. People of color bring in fresh ideas, different cultural elements, and new ways of storytelling that should be celebrated in science fiction. For instance, the infusion of Afro - futurism by black creators has given science fiction a whole new aesthetic and thematic approach, which is a great addition to the genre.
It's likely due to ignorance and prejudice. Some people may be resistant to change and the diversification of the science fiction genre.
They might say it because they think there's too much of it. The market could be flooded with science fiction books, movies, and shows, and they feel it's time for something new.
One reason could be that her works often use a contemporary or near - future setting. In contrast to traditional science fiction that might be set in far - flung galaxies or very distant futures. For example, in her works, the problems she explores are often related to current social and political trends, just with a bit of a speculative twist. So, it gives the impression that she's not writing pure science fiction. Also, her exploration of themes like gender, power, and environmental issues might seem more in line with literary fiction than the typical science - fiction fare.
This statement is completely wrong. People of color have made and are making significant contributions to science fiction. They bring diverse perspectives, cultures, and ideas that enrich the genre.
They might be trying to make a point about how much they like science fiction.
It's offensive because it generalizes an entire group of people as being harmful to something. Disabled people are diverse individuals with a wide range of abilities and interests, and many are passionate about science fiction. To say they 'destroy' it is unjust and shows a lack of understanding and respect.
Maybe they love the movie so much that they want to hear again whatever was said about it. For instance, if it was a trivia fact.
Well, it might be that this person has a very warped view of the world. They could be lumping dogs together with something they consider 'filthy' in the context of a type of writing like 'pulp fiction' perhaps because they see dogs as common or unrefined in some strange way. But it's really not a fair or accurate view of dogs at all.
Perhaps because it deviated from the expected story arc. If it had elements that were not in line with the essence of the original Mulan, like strange character motives, then it could be seen as fan - fiction - like.
In science fiction, people of color are often underrepresented. When they are present, they might be relegated to secondary or stereotypical roles. However, there are also positive examples where they are the heroes or main characters driving the story forward, breaking barriers and showing diverse perspectives in futuristic or alien settings.
There could be several reasons. Firstly, if a person has been consuming a lot of fictional stories and wants a change of pace, they might say 'watch not a story'. They could be looking for something more grounded in reality, like a true - crime documentary. Secondly, they might be interested in learning new things. Non - story - based content such as educational videos or lectures can provide useful information. Lastly, some people might find non - story - based content more relaxing as they don't have to follow a complex plot or remember characters' backstories.