Well, some might think so because they are influenced by traditional gender roles. They might wrongly believe that women are less capable of seeing the whole picture. However, this is far from the truth. Female journalists are diverse in their reporting styles and approaches. They work in different beats, from politics to culture, and they use their unique perspectives to add depth to their stories. They are as capable as male journalists of presenting all sides of an issue. For instance, in covering a political event, a female journalist will interview various stakeholders, analyze different policies, and report on the pros and cons just like any other journalist. It's unfair to single out female journalists in this way.
This is a baseless generalization. Just like male journalists, female journalists are professionals. They strive to present comprehensive and balanced stories. There are many female journalists around the world who are committed to uncovering the truth from multiple aspects, regardless of their gender.
Maybe they think their side is the only right one. They could be too self-centered to consider others' perspectives.
It could be due to deep - seated sexist beliefs. Some people may have been influenced by traditional patriarchal ideas that undervalue women's real - world contributions.
Maybe they just find that one story really captivating and haven't had the time or interest to explore others.
The first story has a very distinct charm. It has a fast - paced and whimsical nature. People who prefer this kind of quick - witted and straightforward storytelling may find the later, more complex and often darker stories less appealing. Also, the character of Buster Scruggs is so iconic in the first story that it's hard for the other parts to live up to that initial impression.
Some people might think that Indian literature did not have novels because the early forms of Indian fictional works were very different from the typical Western novel structure. Indian fictional works often had strong religious or mythological elements intertwined, and the narrative styles were sometimes more episodic rather than the linear plot - driven structure we associate with modern novels.
Maybe it's because the love stories he wrote are so powerful and moving that they overshadow his other works in some people's minds. For example, the complex relationship between Hamlet and Ophelia in 'Hamlet' also has love elements which are often emphasized, making people forget that the play is mainly about revenge and moral dilemmas.
Well, it could be due to the fact that both Kurt Cobain and Pulp Fiction are highly iconic in their respective fields. Some people might be misremembering or making a false connection. Kurt Cobain was a huge figure in the music industry during the 90s, and Pulp Fiction was a revolutionary movie. But there's no real reason for them to be connected in terms of Kurt Cobain being in the movie. It could also be a case of someone spreading misinformation which then got some traction.
Some people might think so because they have stereotypes in their minds. They assume that naive women are more vulnerable to different ideas and stories. But this is a wrong view. It could also be that they misunderstand the nature of curiosity. Just because a naive woman shows interest in a lesbian story doesn't mean she is being seduced.
Maybe they want to keep you curious or they themselves aren't sure of the full story.