Who was at fault in the 'kid throws basketball at girl on bike story'?

Well, in the 'kid throws basketball at girl on bike story', it could be that the kid was just playing around without thinking. He threw the basketball and it hit the girl on the bike. If she was riding fast, this could have been quite a dangerous situation. She could have lost her balance and crashed. And the kid should probably apologize for his actions.

Well, perhaps the kid was being careless while playing with the basketball. Maybe he lost control of it and it accidentally flew towards the girl on the bike. It could also be that the kid was being naughty and threw it on purpose, not realizing the potential danger to the girl.

It's possible that an adult nearby saw what happened and made the kid apologize to the girl. The girl accepted the apology and continued on her way.

In the 'Kid Hits Girl with Backpack' Vine story, the kid seems to be at fault. However, we would need to know more about the lead - up to the incident. Maybe the girl provoked the kid in some way, but still, hitting is not the right way to respond. So, generally, the kid is at fault.

The main characters are Peep and Posy.

I'm not sure specifically what the 'posy bike kid story' is as it could be a very unique or local story. It might be about a kid and a bike named Posy, perhaps their adventures together, like riding through the neighborhood, exploring new places, or having some kind of special encounter while on the bike.

I don't know for sure since we don't have enough details. It could be either of them or some external factor.

It's hard to say. It could be the boy if he was driving recklessly. For instance, if he was speeding or not paying attention to the traffic.

The moa guy who throws the kid off the third story is the primary person to be held responsible. He has directly caused harm to the kid. In addition, if there were any bystanders who could have intervened but didn't, they may also bear some moral responsibility, although the legal liability mainly lies with the perpetrator. If the moa guy is part of an organization or under someone's supervision, and that organization or supervisor had some negligence in preventing this from happening, they might also be questioned legally or morally.

Maybe it was an act of aggression. The guy could have been angry with the girl for some reason, like a heated argument. But without more context, it's hard to say exactly what led to this situation.