Well, if we break it down. 'Dave Meltzer' is a name, and 'won' indicates some form of success or victory. 'Impossible without a good story' suggests that there is a strong connection between achieving whatever it is Dave Meltzer is aiming for and having a good story. For example, if he is a writer, a good story is his product. If he is in business, a good story could be his brand's narrative. In any case, a good story seems to be a necessary ingredient for his success.
No. It doesn't seem to be a common phrase as it's rather unclear and not something that is widely known or used in general language.
I'm not entirely sure what 'davemeltzerwon good story' specifically means as it seems rather unclear. It could potentially be a misspelling or some sort of inside reference. Maybe 'Dave Meltzer' is a person and 'won' could imply he won something related to a 'good story', but without more context it's hard to say.
Definitely not. A proper English phrase would follow grammar rules and have a more logical construction. 'davemeltzerwon' seems like a made - up or miswritten word, and the combination with 'good story' doesn't form a typical phrase structure. It's more like a random collection of words that lack the proper syntactic connection.
In my view, 'ending without story' is when an ending is presented in isolation, detached from the context of a tale. For instance, in a play, if the final scene shows a new character arriving and declaring victory without any prior mention of who they are or what they're fighting for. There's no thread of a story to tie the ending to the rest of the work, making it seem like an ending without a proper story.
Yes, you typically can't enjoy the full BFA story without participating in raiding. Raiding is often an integral part of the game's narrative progression.
Perhaps it implies a love that exists in the present moment, without the need for a past full of stories to define it. It's a love that doesn't rely on shared history or dramatic tales, but is more about the essence of the connection at a given time. For example, two people might meet and have an immediate, deep connection that isn't rooted in any long - drawn - out story of how they got there.
A novel without thunder usually meant that there were no awkward or shocking scenes or plots in the novel, which meant that the reader would feel uncomfortable or bored. Thunderless novels were usually those that had a coherent plot, distinct characters, and strong stories that could attract readers 'interest and immerse them in the story. When reading a novel without thunder, the reader could feel the author's intention and creativity, and it was easier to understand and accept the plot and characters in the story.
A novel without thunder meant that there were no awkward or uncomfortable plots or scenes in the novel. In novels, there are often some embarrassing or uncomfortable plots or scenes that may ruin the reader's reading experience or cause the reader to feel disgusted. Therefore, a novel without thunder meant that there were no such embarrassing or uncomfortable plots or scenes in the novel.
It means that geometry stories, which are full of knowledge about shapes and spaces, add depth to our understanding of the world. Without them, we might not see the hidden order in things.
It could imply a state of liberation or freedom as advocated by Adyashanti that is independent of one's personal narrative. Maybe it means being free from the constraints that our own stories place on us, like past traumas, self - defined identities, etc.