Can you explain more about Dan Rather standing behind the Bush document story?
He could be standing behind it due to his own research and editorial judgment. If his team had vetted the documents and found them to be reliable sources, he would have a basis for his continued support. For instance, they may have cross - checked facts, verified signatures, or ensured the provenance of the documents. However, there could also be external factors influencing his stance, such as a desire to maintain journalistic credibility in the face of potential pushback.
Well, Dan Rather has a long - standing career in journalism. Standing behind the Bush document story could be part of his commitment to truth - telling. If he believes the story is in the public interest, he won't back down easily. Maybe he has first - hand knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the documents. He might have spoken to sources directly involved, and that has convinced him of the story's truth. It could also be that he has seen similar patterns in the Bush administration's actions that are corroborated by the documents, which is why he still stands behind the story.
Dan Rather might be standing behind the story because he sees it as a key revelation. If the Bush documents expose something important, like potential misinformation or actions within the Bush administration, he would support it.
