What does it mean that Dan Rather still stands behind the Bush document story?

Dan Rather might be standing behind the story because he sees it as a key revelation. If the Bush documents expose something important, like potential misinformation or actions within the Bush administration, he would support it.

The 'Rathergate' incident involved a report by Dan Rather on President Bush's military service. The story was based on what turned out to be forged documents. This led to a significant scandal as it raised questions about the integrity of journalistic sources and the vetting process in news reporting.

There were multiple consequences of the Dan Rather Fake Bush New Story. Dan Rather, who had been a respected figure in journalism, saw his career take a nosedive. His name became associated with the scandal of using fake documents. CBS News also suffered greatly. Their viewership and reputation were affected. In the broader context, it contributed to the growing divide between those who trust the media and those who are skeptical. It made the public more aware of the importance of verifying sources in journalism and led to more scrutiny of news reporting in general.

It could mean that Jason Leopold supports or vouches for the story. Maybe he has evidence or strong belief in the truthfulness of the story.

Red maple meant the maple leaves that were red from the frost. This phrase came from Li Shangyin's poem "Visiting Autumn" in the Tang Dynasty. In this poem, red maple was used to describe the autumn scenery. The word 'Danfeng' meant red, and it could also refer to the granules or powders made from Chinese medicine. Other than maple leaves, red maple could also refer to the leaves of other plants that turned red in autumn. In short, red maple was a word to describe the autumn scenery.

The term 'bad bush' is not a common phrase. If it's based on a true story, it could be a story where a particular bush played a negative role. Maybe it was a bush that was in the wrong place, like blocking a path that led to an accident. Or it could be about a bush that was home to some harmful insects or animals that affected people in a certain area. It all depends on the context of the 'true story' which we don't have much information about.

It could imply that the 'new times' (perhaps a publication, organization or a new era in general) supports or adheres to the story related to Spencer. But without more context, it's hard to be very specific.

It could mean that in the new era, a certain entity (maybe a media or a group) supports or upholds the story related to Spencer. However, without more context, it's hard to be more specific.

It was an idiom that meant to look at the people on both sides and say something else. To describe having nothing to say, deliberately avoiding the question and using other words to brush it off. This idiom originated from Mencius and his disciple, Mencius, King Hui of Liang. In modern society, being tactful could be seen as a kind of wisdom and interpersonal skills, which could help us better integrate into social situations and get along with others, avoiding unnecessary quarrels and conflicts. However, we cannot blindly pursue balance and lose our independent thinking and perspectives. In appropriate situations, we need to exercise our opinions and express our opinions appropriately.

Dan's pronunciation was dàn or tán, meaning quiet, peaceful appearance, also referring to the gentle appearance of water waves.