5 year old thrown off three story: Who could be responsible for such an act?

Well, first of all, the one who actually threw the kid is clearly responsible. This could be a deranged individual. However, if there were others around who could have prevented it but didn't, they might also bear some responsibility. For example, if there were security guards or neighbors who saw the situation developing and didn't intervene. Also, if there was a situation where the building had faulty safety features that contributed to the kid being thrown, the building owner or management could potentially be held accountable.

The child could suffer from severe physical injuries such as broken bones, internal bleeding, and head trauma. There's also a high risk of long - term disabilities, both physical and mental.

It could be an abuser, perhaps someone with malicious intent in the children's environment.

Well, it depends on various factors. If there were something soft like a big pile of cushions or a trampoline below, he could have a chance of surviving with less severe injuries. But generally, being thrown off the third story is likely to cause fractures, internal bleeding and head trauma.

It could be an angry minor god. Maybe a god who has always been overshadowed by the big three and decides to get revenge. This god, using some dark magic they've been secretly studying, turns the big three into animals.

The comics for Qing Yuannian were Wang Qinian and Fan Sizhe.

The headmaster, Dumbledore, could also be the one to discipline Hermione. He has the overall authority in Hogwarts. If Hermione's actions endanger the safety of the school or other students in some way in the fanfiction world, Dumbledore could step in with a form of discipline, perhaps by restricting her access to certain areas of the school for a while.

I don't think it can be attributed to any one individual. It's more likely due to a shift in cultural preferences, competition from other genres, and changes in the publishing industry.

The moa guy who throws the kid off the third story is the primary person to be held responsible. He has directly caused harm to the kid. In addition, if there were any bystanders who could have intervened but didn't, they may also bear some moral responsibility, although the legal liability mainly lies with the perpetrator. If the moa guy is part of an organization or under someone's supervision, and that organization or supervisor had some negligence in preventing this from happening, they might also be questioned legally or morally.

Three-year-olds with normal intelligence can usually tell simple stories, but the content may not be very deep or complicated. The complexity of a story often depended on the theme, plot, and the complexity of the characters. If the theme of the story is more profound or the plot is more complicated, it may be difficult for a three-year-old child to understand the meaning. However, three-year-olds also had their own abilities and potential. They could tell some simple stories to show their imagination and creativity. In this case, the plot and theme of the story did not need to be very profound, as long as it was interesting and imaginative.