One important new evidence is related to the study of ancient DNA. Although it's extremely difficult to obtain intact megalodon DNA, any fragments that are found can tell a lot about their genetic makeup and relation to other species. Also, new evidence from the study of ocean currents in the past. Since megalodon was a large predator, understanding how ocean currents affected its movement and hunting grounds is crucial. And of course, better - preserved fossils are always a great source of new evidence as they can show more details about the physical characteristics of megalodon.
The main new evidence is from improved fossil analysis. Scientists are now able to extract more information from megalodon teeth and bones. For example, they can study the chemical composition to understand what the megalodon ate. Another type of new evidence comes from advanced geological studies. By looking at the layers of rock where megalodon fossils are found, they can determine the time period more accurately and also understand the environmental conditions at that time.
Fact. There has been new evidence emerging over time that supports the existence of megalodon in the past. Fossil records are a major part of this evidence. These fossils show the large size of their teeth and some skeletal remains which give us an idea of their massive size and structure. Also, studies on ancient ocean ecosystems suggest that an apex predator like megalodon could have thrived in those conditions.
Fiction. Consider this, in all of our exploration of the oceans, which is still not complete but quite extensive, we have not found any conclusive evidence of mermaids. The idea of a half - human, half - fish creature goes against the known biological principles. For a mermaid to exist as commonly depicted, it would require a very strange and unlikely combination of mammalian and fish - like characteristics that have no basis in evolutionary biology.
Fiction. If we look at the history of mermaid claims, they are always based on something that can be rationally explained away. The new evidence, whatever it may be, probably falls into the same category. It could be a case of people seeing what they want to see or misidentifying something ordinary as a mermaid. There's no real evidence to suggest that these mythical creatures actually exist.
Evolution is a fact. Evidence includes fossil records which display a clear sequence of life forms over time. For instance, the discovery of Archaeopteryx, a creature with both reptilian and avian features, is strong evidence for evolution.
Regarding evidence for Moses, religious texts are a major source. The detailed accounts in the Torah, for instance, are seen as evidence by believers. But from a scientific and archaeological perspective, it's more complex. There are no inscriptions or artifacts that directly name Moses. However, some historians believe that the general story of a group of people leaving Egypt could be based on real events. And if there were such an event, it's likely there was a leader, which could be Moses. So, the evidence is not conclusive either way.
Yes, time travel might be a fact. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, time dilation occurs. For example, astronauts on the International Space Station age slightly slower than people on Earth due to their high - speed movement relative to Earth. This shows that time can be affected by factors like speed and gravity, which is a form of time - related distortion similar to what we might consider time travel on a very small scale.
Evidence for it being fiction lies in the movie - specific elements. The idea of a love story that unfolds so perfectly during a disaster is more of a creative concept. On the other hand, the fact that there were people of different classes on the Titanic means relationships could have formed. But the elaborate and fictional details of the movie's love story, such as the grand gestures and the specific character backgrounds, are not based on historical fact.
Photos and videos. There are numerous photos and videos taken during the moon landings. These show astronauts on the lunar surface, the lunar module, and the American flag planted there. The lighting and shadows in these visuals are consistent with the conditions on the moon.
Fact. Megalodon is not a fictional creature. The discovery of its fossils, especially those huge teeth, is a clear indication. These teeth are not only large but also have unique characteristics that match what we would expect from a shark of its size. Based on the geological layers where the fossils are found, we can estimate when it lived and how it might have interacted with other species in the ancient oceans. It's truly one of the most amazing prehistoric animals that ever lived.
The lack of archaeological evidence is a big sign that the Knights of the Round Table are mostly fictional. In terms of written records, the early accounts are more like stories passed down through generations rather than historical documents. However, some aspects might be based on real cultural and social norms of the time, like the importance of chivalry among knights. But overall, the evidence points to fiction.