What are the main differences between the 'Prince of Thieves Based on True Story' and the historical facts?

One major difference between facts and fiction in 'Marie: A True Story' is the level of authenticity. Facts are based on real - life evidence. If Marie was part of a particular organization and there are membership records to show it, that's a fact. Fiction can be detected when the story bends the truth for the sake of entertainment. For example, if it portrays Marie as having superhuman abilities or making impossible achievements. That's clearly not in line with historical facts. Another difference is in the portrayal of relationships. Real relationships that Marie had, based on historical research, are facts, while fictional relationships added for the story's plot are not.

One main similarity could be the overall structure of the robberies. If the true story involved bank heists, the book might follow a similar pattern of planning, entering the bank, and getting away with the money. For example, the use of disguises or specific timing.

Well, in the real story of Hugh Glass, we might not have known every single detail of his thoughts and emotions as vividly as the movie shows. The movie 'The Revenant' may have dramatized certain aspects for the sake of entertainment. For example, the action scenes and the way the revenge is portrayed might be more intense in the movie. And there could be some differences in the portrayal of the environment. The movie might have enhanced the look of the wilderness for visual impact compared to how it actually was during Glass's time.

The 'Prince of Thieves' book has elements that are based on a true story. It takes inspiration from real - world situations, such as the nature of thievery in a particular time and place. The author might have researched historical accounts of thieves and their modus operandi, and incorporated those details into the story. This gives the book a sense of authenticity and makes it more than just a fictional tale.

Yasuke was a real African man who ended up in Japan during the Sengoku period. He became a retainer to Oda Nobunaga. He was known for his physical strength and his unique appearance in Japan at that time. Nobunaga was intrigued by him and accepted him into his service.

In 'The Favourite', the relationships between the characters might be simplified or emphasized differently from the true story. The movie has to condense a lot of historical events and relationships into a two - hour narrative. So, some of the more nuanced aspects of the real - life relationships could be lost or altered. Also, the movie might add fictional elements like some of the specific scenes and dialogues that didn't actually happen in the real - life events it's based on.

In 'The Watcher', they might combine or change characters' traits compared to the real - life counterparts in the true story. For example, a character's motives in the show could be made more mysterious or complex than they were in reality. Also, the show might add fictional elements like additional plot twists that didn't occur in the true story to keep the audience on the edge of their seats.

No. The Lilith story is mainly from religious and mythological traditions, not historical facts. It has been passed down through religious texts and oral traditions, but there is no evidence of a real - life 'Lilith' in the sense of historical documentation.

Yes. Mulan is believed to be based on some historical elements. In Chinese history, there are stories about a brave woman disguising as a man to join the army in place of her father. However, over time, it has also been embellished with fictional elements in different retellings.

There is some debate. While it is a legend, some aspects might be based on historical situations in ancient China. For example, the existence of conscription and the role of family honor in society could be real elements that inspired the story.