Public discussion should be centered around positive, educational and inclusive topics. Sexy stories may make some people feel uncomfortable or violate social ethics.
In a civilized society, we advocate topics that can promote the progress of the whole society, such as scientific discovery, cultural inheritance and environmental protection. These topics are much more meaningful than sexy stories.
No. Such stories usually contain adult - themed or inappropriate content which is not suitable for public discussion.
No. Sexy arousing stories are not suitable for public discussion as they often contain inappropriate content that goes against public moral standards.
No. These types of stories are usually private and often involve elements that are not suitable for public consumption.
No. Such stories are usually inappropriate for public discussion as they often contain vulgar and private content that may make others uncomfortable.
No. Such stories often involve private and inappropriate content that is not suitable for public discussion. Public discussion should be centered around positive, moral and educational topics.
No. Public discussion should be centered around topics that are inclusive, educational and positive. Sexy stories are not appropriate for this kind of setting as they can be offensive to many people.
Definitely not. These kinds of stories often cross the boundaries of propriety. We should promote conversations that are family - friendly and respectful in public.
Definitely not. Public spaces are meant for family - friendly and general - audience topics. Erotic stories are private and inappropriate for public consumption and discussion.
No. Sexy heterosexual interactive stories usually involve private and often adult - oriented content that is not appropriate for public discussion.
No. Masturbation is a private act, and stories about it are not suitable for public discussion as it goes against social propriety.
No. Sex stories involve private and often sensitive sexual content, which is not suitable for public discussion. It violates public decency.