This phrase is rather unclear and could potentially be offensive. If it means being compelled to read or engage with gay - themed stories in an unwanted way, that would be wrong. Everyone should have the choice to explore or not explore different types of stories based on their own preferences and values.
This statement is rather unclear and ambiguous. If it's suggesting that a college is being 'forced' to deal with stories related to the gay community, it could potentially be about the college having to address issues like discrimination, acceptance, or perhaps misinformation regarding gay students or topics. But without more context, it's hard to be certain.
No. It is a completely inappropriate expression. It contains vulgar language and may also imply disrespect towards the gay community and their stories.
The phrase 'gay suck bet story' is very difficult to decipher. 'Gay' is a well - known term related to sexual orientation. But'suck' and 'bet' together with it make no obvious sense. Maybe it was a story created by someone who was using these words in a very idiosyncratic way, perhaps in a local or personal slang that we are not familiar with.
It's a rather unclear phrase. 'Gay' refers to the sexual orientation. But 'old suck young' doesn't have a clear positive meaning in a normal context. It could potentially be some sort of misnomer or a very local, idiosyncratic way of referring to stories involving older and younger gay individuals, but without more context it's hard to be certain.
I'm not entirely sure what 'wige' means in this context. It could be a misspelling. If it's about a story of forced homosexuality, it's a very serious and unethical situation. Forced sexual orientation is completely wrong as everyone should have the right to freely define their own sexual identity.
I'm not entirely sure what specific meaning this phrase is intended to have. It could potentially be some very ungrammatical or unclear statement. It might be a made - up or very niche expression that doesn't have a common, well - known meaning.
It might imply that in the realm of fan - created stories (fanfic), the idea of combining different fictional worlds (crossovers) is not appealing. Maybe they've read some crossovers that were poorly written, had inconsistent characters from different universes, or just didn't capture the essence of either original universe well.
It could mean being compelled to remove or simplify stories. Maybe in a journalistic context, due to some external pressures like censorship, legal issues or editorial policies, one has to cut out certain elements or even whole stories. For example, if a story contains sensitive information about a powerful entity, the publisher might be forced to strip the story to avoid potential trouble.
I would say it's a made - up statement. In reality, colleges may be involved in various aspects regarding the gay community, like creating inclusive policies or providing support. But this phrase doesn't conform to any normal or legitimate situation. It gives the wrong impression and is not a description of an actual phenomenon.
There are very few positive or acceptable stories of this nature in mainstream literature. However, in some dark, dystopian or cautionary tales, there might be situations where boys are forced into difficult or degrading acts as a way to show the extreme oppression or inhumane nature of a particular regime or situation. For example, in some novels that depict slavery or extreme child labor situations, there could be elements where children, including boys, are forced into various forms of servitude that could be metaphorically related to the idea in the title, but it is always presented in a context of condemning such practices.