No one would tell a true story. Is it always the case in literature?

I'm not sure. It could be inspired by real-life situations but might not be a direct retelling of a specific true story. Maybe it's a fictional creation with elements that feel real.

Maybe people are afraid of the consequences or judgment. They might worry that the truth could cause problems for them or others.

No, it's not based on real events. The story was created by the filmmakers to entertain the audience. It might draw inspiration from common themes and situations, but it's not a true account of something that happened in real life.

It could be that there's some sort of pressure or threat preventing them from sharing the truth. Or perhaps they themselves don't fully understand the whole story.

Maybe it's because they lack the confidence. Telling a lifetime true story requires a certain amount of self - assurance. If someone doesn't believe that their story is interesting or valuable enough, they won't tell it. Moreover, in a fast - paced world, people are often more focused on the present and future rather than delving into their past and sharing it.

Maybe it's because the story is too personal or controversial. People might be afraid of the consequences of sharing it.

I think it is. From what I know, the movie takes cues from actual happenings and presents them in a cinematic form with some creative additions.

No, it isn't. Case 39 is a fictional story created for entertainment purposes.

No, it's not. Case 39 is a fictional story created for entertainment purposes.

I'm not sure. It depends on the specific details and the source of the story. Sometimes, what seems like a true story could have elements of fiction added for dramatic effect.