How reliable are informants based on true story?
The reliability of informants based on true story varies. In some cases, like in a neighborhood where someone witnessed a burglary and becomes an informant, their account of the true story is likely to be reliable as long as they have no reason to lie. But in other situations, such as in complex business espionage cases, an informant based on a true story might be exaggerating or omitting certain details to protect themselves or gain an advantage. So, while the basis of a true story is a good start, a thorough investigation is always needed to fully assess their reliability.
Informants based on true story are generally reliable. Take the example of a whistleblower in a government corruption case. If they have first - hand knowledge of the corrupt activities through their own true story of being involved in or witnessing the situation, their information is likely to be accurate. But it's important to cross - check their information as they could misinterpret some details or be influenced by external pressures. Still, the fact that it's rooted in a true story gives it a certain level of credibility.
They can be quite reliable. Since their information is based on real experiences, it often has a solid foundation. However, their reliability also depends on factors like their motives. If they have a personal vendetta, it might color their information. But overall, if they are honest about what they've witnessed in their true story, they can be a valuable source of information.
